Ad is loading...
LAIDX vs TRIGX
LAIDX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts LAIDX vs TRIGX
Lord Abbett International Value I
Price$9.15
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets434.62M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$20.18
Change+$0.12 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.32B
LAIDX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAIDX vs. TRIGX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAIDX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 14.3B vs. LAIDX (435M). LAIDX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: LAIDX (3.01) vs TRIGX (2.21). LAIDX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: LAIDX (17 years) vs TRIGX (26 years). TRIGX (0.87) is less costly to investors than LAIDX (0.74). LAIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAIDX: TRIGX (2500) vs LAIDX (1000000). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.72 vs. LAIDX (14.53). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 111.08 vs. LAIDX (84.17).
| LAIDX | TRIGX | LAIDX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.87 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.87 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.593 | 18.069 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 435M | 14.3B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.01 | 2.21 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.53 | 16.72 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.59 | 54.99 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.17 | 111.08 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.46 | 56.47 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers