Ad is loading...
LALDX vs LDLFX
LALDX vs LDLFX Comparison
Open Charts LALDX vs LDLFX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income A
Price$3.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.95B
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income F
Price$3.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.95B
LALDX vs LDLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LALDX vs. LDLFX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LALDX is a Hold and LDLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LALDX (41.9B) and LDLFX (41.9B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . LDLFX (5.07) and LALDX (4.95) have matching dividends . LALDX was incepted earlier than LDLFX: LALDX (31 years) vs LDLFX (18 years). LALDX (0.58) is less costly to investors than LDLFX (0.48). LALDX (92.00) and LDLFX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. LDLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LALDX: LDLFX (0) vs LALDX (1500). LDLFX (6.59) and LALDX (6.48) have marching annual gain over last year. LDLFX (15.93) and LALDX (15.35) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LALDX | LDLFX | LALDX / LDLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.48 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.48 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.240 | 1.528 | 81% |
| Front Load | 2% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.9B | 41.9B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.95 | 5.07 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.48 | 6.59 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.50 | 11.11 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.35 | 15.93 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.79 | 27.02 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers