Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LALDX vs LDLFX
LALDX vs LDLFX Comparison
Open Charts LALDX vs LDLFX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income A
Price$3.89
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.83B
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income F
Price$3.88
Change-$0.01 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.83B
LALDX vs LDLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LALDX vs. LDLFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LALDX is a Hold and LDLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LALDX (42.8B) and LDLFX (42.8B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . LDLFX (5.14) and LALDX (5.04) have matching dividends . LALDX was incepted earlier than LDLFX: LALDX (32 years) vs LDLFX (18 years). LALDX (0.58) is less costly to investors than LDLFX (0.48). LALDX (92.00) and LDLFX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. LDLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LALDX: LDLFX (0) vs LALDX (1500). LDLFX (5.85) and LALDX (5.74) have marching annual gain over last year. LDLFX (13.57) and LALDX (13.00) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LALDX | LDLFX | LALDX / LDLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.48 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.48 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.859 | 5.222 | 93% |
| Front Load | 2% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.8B | 42.8B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.04 | 5.14 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.74 | 5.85 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.61 | 17.97 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.00 | 13.57 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.61 | 31.89 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers