Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMAX vs VFFSX
LAMAX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMAX vs VFFSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth A
Price$24.16
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.42B
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$306.80
Change+$0.43 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.49T
LAMAX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMAX vs. VFFSX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMAX is a Buy and VFFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.49T vs. LAMAX (4.42B). VFFSX pays higher dividends than LAMAX: VFFSX (1.23) vs LAMAX (0.62). LAMAX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: LAMAX (24 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). LAMAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). LAMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). LAMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: LAMAX (1000) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.56 vs. LAMAX (7.06). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 94.29 vs. LAMAX (56.90).
| LAMAX | VFFSX | LAMAX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.01 | 8,900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.01 | 8,900% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.241 | 6.495 | 111% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.42B | 1.49T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 1.23 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.06 | 11.56 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.93 | 62.25 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.90 | 94.29 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.52 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement