Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMAX vs VFFSX
LAMAX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMAX vs VFFSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth A
Price$25.35
Change+$0.14 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.57B
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$325.51
Change+$1.23 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46T
LAMAX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMAX vs. VFFSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMAX is a Hold and VFFSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.46T vs. LAMAX (4.57B). VFFSX pays higher dividends than LAMAX: VFFSX (1.13) vs LAMAX (0.61). LAMAX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: LAMAX (24 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). LAMAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). LAMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). LAMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: LAMAX (1000) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.90 vs. LAMAX (4.68). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 86.25 vs. LAMAX (47.52).
| LAMAX | VFFSX | LAMAX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.01 | 8,900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.01 | 8,900% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.181 | 12.736 | 96% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.57B | 1.46T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 1.13 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.68 | 11.90 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.47 | 67.07 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.52 | 86.25 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.91 | N/A | - |