Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMAX vs VFFSX
LAMAX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMAX vs VFFSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth A
Price$23.20
Change-$0.05 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.26B
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$291.21
Change-$1.53 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43T
LAMAX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMAX vs. VFFSX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMAX is a Buy and VFFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.43T vs. LAMAX (4.26B). VFFSX pays higher dividends than LAMAX: VFFSX (1.29) vs LAMAX (0.64). LAMAX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: LAMAX (23 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). LAMAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). LAMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). LAMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: LAMAX (1000) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.57 vs. LAMAX (7.47). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 86.89 vs. LAMAX (51.14).
| LAMAX | VFFSX | LAMAX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.01 | 8,900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.01 | 8,900% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.111 | 1.749 | 178% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.26B | 1.43T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 1.29 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.47 | 11.57 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.17 | 44.96 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.14 | 86.89 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement