Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMAX vs VFFSX
LAMAX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMAX vs VFFSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth A
Price$25.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.63B
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$323.82
Change-$0.31 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.37T
LAMAX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMAX vs. VFFSX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMAX is a Buy and VFFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.37T vs. LAMAX (4.63B). VFFSX pays higher dividends than LAMAX: VFFSX (1.18) vs LAMAX (0.60). LAMAX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: LAMAX (24 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). LAMAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). LAMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). LAMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: LAMAX (1000) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.32 vs. LAMAX (9.08). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 99.18 vs. LAMAX (57.24).
| LAMAX | VFFSX | LAMAX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.01 | 8,900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.01 | 8,900% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.438 | 12.668 | 98% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.63B | 1.37T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.18 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.08 | 17.32 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.85 | 70.68 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.24 | 99.18 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement