Ad is loading...
LAMCX vs VFFSX
LAMCX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMCX vs VFFSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth C
Price$21.94
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.1B
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$277.16
Change-$0.14 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.33T
LAMCX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMCX vs. VFFSX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMCX is a Buy and VFFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.34T vs. LAMCX (4.1B). VFFSX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: VFFSX (1.37) vs LAMCX (0.00). LAMCX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: LAMCX (23 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). LAMCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). LAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). LAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: LAMCX (1000) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.61 vs. LAMCX (5.89). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 93.27 vs. LAMCX (55.84).
| LAMCX | VFFSX | LAMCX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.01 | 16,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.01 | 16,400% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.082 | -3.667 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.1B | 1.34T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.37 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.89 | 8.61 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.95 | 41.63 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.84 | 93.27 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers