Ad is loading...
LAMCX vs VFFSX
LAMCX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMCX vs VFFSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth C
Price$22.66
Change+$0.16 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.27B
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$293.54
Change+$2.91 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.35T
LAMCX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMCX vs. VFFSX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMCX is a Hold and VFFSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.35T vs. LAMCX (4.27B). VFFSX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: VFFSX (1.33) vs LAMCX (0.08). LAMCX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: LAMCX (23 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). LAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). LAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: LAMCX (1000) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.56 vs. LAMCX (18.51). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 80.32 vs. LAMCX (40.62).
| LAMCX | VFFSX | LAMCX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.164 | 2.012 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.27B | 1.35T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 1.33 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.51 | 25.56 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.31 | 31.20 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.62 | 80.32 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...