Ad is loading...
LAMCX vs VFFSX
LAMCX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMCX vs VFFSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth C
Price$20.48
Change-$0.54 (-2.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.94B
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$257.79
Change-$9.19 (-3.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32T
LAMCX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMCX vs. VFFSX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMCX is a Buy and VFFSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.32T vs. LAMCX (3.94B). VFFSX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: VFFSX (1.36) vs LAMCX (0.00). LAMCX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: LAMCX (23 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). LAMCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). LAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). LAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: LAMCX (1000) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.79 vs. LAMCX (2.04). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 95.76 vs. LAMCX (54.00).
| LAMCX | VFFSX | LAMCX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.01 | 16,500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.01 | 16,500% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.230 | -7.205 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.94B | 1.32T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.36 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.04 | 5.79 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.63 | 23.80 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.00 | 95.76 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.58 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...