Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMCX vs VFFSX
LAMCX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMCX vs VFFSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth C
Price$24.45
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.52B
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$318.68
Change+$1.01 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.33T
LAMCX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMCX vs. VFFSX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMCX is a Buy and VFFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.33T vs. LAMCX (4.52B). VFFSX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: VFFSX (1.20) vs LAMCX (0.00). LAMCX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: LAMCX (24 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). LAMCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). LAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). LAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: LAMCX (1000) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.97 vs. LAMCX (7.38). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 84.91 vs. LAMCX (45.74).
| LAMCX | VFFSX | LAMCX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.01 | 16,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.01 | 16,400% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.144 | 10.423 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.52B | 1.33T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.38 | 15.97 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.85 | 60.95 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.74 | 84.91 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement