Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMCX vs VFFSX
LAMCX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMCX vs VFFSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth C
Price$24.85
Change+$0.13 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.57B
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$325.51
Change+$1.23 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46T
LAMCX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMCX vs. VFFSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMCX is a Hold and VFFSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.46T vs. LAMCX (4.57B). VFFSX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: VFFSX (1.13) vs LAMCX (0.00). LAMCX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: LAMCX (24 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). LAMCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). LAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). LAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: LAMCX (1000) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.90 vs. LAMCX (3.82). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 86.25 vs. LAMCX (42.96).
| LAMCX | VFFSX | LAMCX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.01 | 16,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.01 | 16,400% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.452 | 12.736 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.57B | 1.46T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.13 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.82 | 11.90 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.31 | 67.07 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.96 | 86.25 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.30 | N/A | - |