Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMCX vs VFFSX
LAMCX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMCX vs VFFSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth C
Price$22.75
Change-$0.05 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.25B
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$291.21
Change-$1.53 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43T
LAMCX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMCX vs. VFFSX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMCX is a Buy and VFFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.43T vs. LAMCX (4.25B). VFFSX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: VFFSX (1.29) vs LAMCX (0.00). LAMCX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: LAMCX (23 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). LAMCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). LAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). LAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: LAMCX (1000) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.57 vs. LAMCX (6.59). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 86.89 vs. LAMCX (46.95).
| LAMCX | VFFSX | LAMCX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.01 | 16,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.01 | 16,400% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.795 | 1.749 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.25B | 1.43T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.29 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.59 | 11.57 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.71 | 44.96 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.95 | 86.89 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers