Ad is loading...
LAMCX vs VFFSX
LAMCX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMCX vs VFFSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth C
Price$22.87
Change-$0.36 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.31B
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$294.71
Change-$5.11 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.41T
LAMCX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMCX vs. VFFSX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMCX is a StrongBuy and VFFSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.41T vs. LAMCX (4.31B). VFFSX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: VFFSX (1.33) vs LAMCX (0.08). LAMCX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: LAMCX (23 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). LAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). LAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: LAMCX (1000) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.36 vs. LAMCX (13.48). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 83.40 vs. LAMCX (44.07).
| LAMCX | VFFSX | LAMCX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.734 | 4.195 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.31B | 1.41T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 1.33 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.48 | 20.36 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.47 | 42.28 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.07 | 83.40 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.41 | N/A | - |