Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMCX vs VSTSX
LAMCX vs VSTSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMCX vs VSTSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth C
Price$23.70
Change+$0.09 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.4B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Instl Sel
Price$296.37
Change+$1.79 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91T
LAMCX vs VSTSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMCX vs. VSTSX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMCX is a Buy and VSTSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSTSX has more cash in the bank: 1.91T vs. LAMCX (4.4B). VSTSX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: VSTSX (1.23) vs LAMCX (0.00). LAMCX was incepted earlier than VSTSX: LAMCX (24 years) vs VSTSX (9 years). LAMCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than VSTSX (0.01). LAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VSTSX (2.00). LAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSTSX: LAMCX (1000) vs VSTSX (5000000000). VSTSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.82 vs. LAMCX (4.79). VSTSX return over 5 years is better than : 88.51 vs. LAMCX (50.72).
| LAMCX | VSTSX | LAMCX / VSTSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.01 | 16,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.01 | 16,400% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.447 | 5.721 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.4B | 1.91T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.79 | 9.82 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.50 | 59.53 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.72 | 88.51 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement