Ad is loading...
LAMCX vs VTSAX
LAMCX vs VTSAX Comparison
Open Charts LAMCX vs VTSAX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth C
Price$21.94
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.1B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm
Price$135.32
Change-$0.08 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.72T
LAMCX vs VTSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMCX vs. VTSAX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMCX is a Buy and VTSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSAX has more cash in the bank: 1.72T vs. LAMCX (4.1B). VTSAX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: VTSAX (1.36) vs LAMCX (0.00). LAMCX was incepted earlier than VTSAX: LAMCX (23 years) vs VTSAX (25 years). LAMCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than VTSAX (0.04). LAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSAX (2.00). LAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSAX: LAMCX (1000) vs VTSAX (3000). VTSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. LAMCX (5.89). VTSAX return over 5 years is better than : 89.19 vs. LAMCX (55.84).
| LAMCX | VTSAX | LAMCX / VTSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.04 | 4,100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.04 | 4,100% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.082 | -4.018 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.1B | 1.72T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.36 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.89 | 7.95 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.95 | 40.09 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.84 | 89.19 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.42 | 165.84 | 32% |