Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMCX vs VTSAX
LAMCX vs VTSAX Comparison
Open Charts LAMCX vs VTSAX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth C
Price$23.70
Change+$0.09 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.4B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm
Price$150.50
Change+$0.91 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91T
LAMCX vs VTSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMCX vs. VTSAX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMCX is a Buy and VTSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSAX has more cash in the bank: 1.91T vs. LAMCX (4.4B). VTSAX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: VTSAX (1.21) vs LAMCX (0.00). LAMCX was incepted earlier than VTSAX: LAMCX (24 years) vs VTSAX (25 years). LAMCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than VTSAX (0.04). LAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSAX (2.00). LAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSAX: LAMCX (1000) vs VTSAX (3000). VTSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.80 vs. LAMCX (4.79). VTSAX return over 5 years is better than : 89.12 vs. LAMCX (50.72).
| LAMCX | VTSAX | LAMCX / VTSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.04 | 4,100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.04 | 4,100% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.447 | 6.118 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.4B | 1.91T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.79 | 11.80 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.50 | 61.23 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.72 | 89.12 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.25 | 190.51 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement