Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMCX vs VTSAX
LAMCX vs VTSAX Comparison
Open Charts LAMCX vs VTSAX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth C
Price$25.13
Change-$0.10 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.69B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm
Price$160.46
Change-$0.76 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02T
LAMCX vs VTSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMCX vs. VTSAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMCX is a Buy and VTSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSAX has more cash in the bank: 2.02T vs. LAMCX (4.7B). VTSAX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: VTSAX (1.13) vs LAMCX (0.00). LAMCX was incepted earlier than VTSAX: LAMCX (24 years) vs VTSAX (25 years). LAMCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than VTSAX (0.04). LAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSAX (2.00). LAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSAX: LAMCX (1000) vs VTSAX (3000). VTSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.35 vs. LAMCX (9.08). VTSAX return over 5 years is better than : 89.11 vs. LAMCX (50.42).
| LAMCX | VTSAX | LAMCX / VTSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.04 | 4,100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.04 | 4,100% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.751 | 14.392 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.7B | 2.02T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.13 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.08 | 18.35 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.46 | 82.10 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.42 | 89.11 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.22 | 231.82 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement