Ad is loading...
LAMCX vs VTSMX
LAMCX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts LAMCX vs VTSMX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth C
Price$20.48
Change-$0.54 (-2.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.94B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$125.25
Change-$4.60 (-3.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7T
LAMCX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMCX vs. VTSMX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMCX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.7T vs. LAMCX (3.94B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: VTSMX (1.25) vs LAMCX (0.00). LAMCX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: LAMCX (23 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). LAMCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). LAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). LAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: LAMCX (1000) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.72 vs. LAMCX (2.04). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 92.15 vs. LAMCX (54.00).
| LAMCX | VTSMX | LAMCX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.14 | 1,179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.14 | 1,179% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.230 | -7.881 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.94B | 1.7T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.25 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.04 | 4.72 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.63 | 20.95 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.00 | 92.15 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.58 | 154.63 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers