Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMCX vs VTSMX
LAMCX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts LAMCX vs VTSMX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth C
Price$24.85
Change+$0.13 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.57B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$158.28
Change+$0.53 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05T
LAMCX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMCX vs. VTSMX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMCX is a Hold and VTSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 2.05T vs. LAMCX (4.57B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: VTSMX (1.02) vs LAMCX (0.00). LAMCX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: LAMCX (24 years) vs VTSMX (34 years). LAMCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). LAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). LAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: LAMCX (1000) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.79 vs. LAMCX (3.82). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 77.62 vs. LAMCX (42.96).
| LAMCX | VTSMX | LAMCX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.14 | 1,171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.14 | 1,171% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.452 | 11.948 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.57B | 2.05T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.82 | 10.79 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.31 | 63.83 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.96 | 77.62 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.30 | 213.77 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement