Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMCX vs VTSMX
LAMCX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts LAMCX vs VTSMX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth C
Price$24.45
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.52B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$155.77
Change+$0.56 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91T
LAMCX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMCX vs. VTSMX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMCX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.91T vs. LAMCX (4.52B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: VTSMX (1.09) vs LAMCX (0.00). LAMCX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: LAMCX (24 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). LAMCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). LAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). LAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: LAMCX (1000) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.91 vs. LAMCX (7.38). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 80.22 vs. LAMCX (45.74).
| LAMCX | VTSMX | LAMCX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.14 | 1,171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.14 | 1,171% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.144 | 10.125 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.52B | 1.91T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.38 | 15.91 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.85 | 58.13 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.74 | 80.22 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.80 | 223.55 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement