Ad is loading...
LAMFX vs VFFSX
LAMFX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMFX vs VFFSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth F
Price$21.26
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.88B
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$258.55
Change+$0.35 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32T
LAMFX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMFX vs. VFFSX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMFX is a Buy and VFFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.32T vs. LAMFX (3.88B). VFFSX pays higher dividends than LAMFX: VFFSX (1.36) vs LAMFX (0.80). LAMFX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: LAMFX (18 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). LAMFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). LAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). LAMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: LAMFX (0) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.25 vs. LAMFX (3.85). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 83.93 vs. LAMFX (53.72).
| LAMFX | VFFSX | LAMFX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.01 | 6,500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.01 | 7,500% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.508 | -10.135 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.88B | 1.32T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.36 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.85 | 5.25 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.64 | 20.44 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.72 | 83.93 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.55 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...