Ad is loading...
LAMFX vs VFFSX
LAMFX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMFX vs VFFSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth F
Price$22.06
Change-$0.18 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.08B
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$273.29
Change-$2.08 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.4T
LAMFX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMFX vs. VFFSX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMFX is a Hold and VFFSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.4T vs. LAMFX (4.08B). VFFSX pays higher dividends than LAMFX: VFFSX (1.23) vs LAMFX (0.75). LAMFX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: LAMFX (17 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). LAMFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). LAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). LAMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: LAMFX (0) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.79 vs. LAMFX (6.06). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 127.41 vs. LAMFX (83.65).
| LAMFX | VFFSX | LAMFX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.01 | 6,500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.01 | 7,500% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.413 | -4.302 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.08B | 1.4T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.23 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.06 | 9.79 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.12 | 33.68 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.65 | 127.41 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.61 | N/A | - |