Ad is loading...
LAMFX vs VFFSX
LAMFX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMFX vs VFFSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth F
Price$22.58
Change+$0.05 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.1B
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$277.30
Change+$1.59 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.33T
LAMFX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMFX vs. VFFSX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMFX is a Buy and VFFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.34T vs. LAMFX (4.1B). VFFSX pays higher dividends than LAMFX: VFFSX (1.37) vs LAMFX (0.81). LAMFX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: LAMFX (18 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). LAMFX (0.74) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). LAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). LAMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: LAMFX (0) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.61 vs. LAMFX (7.34). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 92.26 vs. LAMFX (61.77).
| LAMFX | VFFSX | LAMFX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.01 | 6,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.01 | 7,400% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.923 | -4.171 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.1B | 1.34T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 1.37 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 8.61 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.03 | 41.23 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.77 | 92.26 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...