Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMFX vs VFFSX
LAMFX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMFX vs VFFSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth F
Price$24.75
Change+$0.12 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.47B
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$312.76
Change+$1.26 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.49T
LAMFX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMFX vs. VFFSX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMFX is a Buy and VFFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.49T vs. LAMFX (4.47B). VFFSX pays higher dividends than LAMFX: VFFSX (1.23) vs LAMFX (0.75). LAMFX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: LAMFX (18 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). LAMFX (0.74) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). LAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). LAMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: LAMFX (0) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.94 vs. LAMFX (11.10). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 98.17 vs. LAMFX (59.53).
| LAMFX | VFFSX | LAMFX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.01 | 6,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.01 | 7,400% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.531 | 8.278 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.47B | 1.49T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.23 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.10 | 17.94 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.04 | 62.50 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.53 | 98.17 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement