Ad is loading...
LAMFX vs VTSAX
LAMFX vs VTSAX Comparison
Open Charts LAMFX vs VTSAX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth F
Price$21.26
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.88B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm
Price$125.97
Change+$0.29 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7T
LAMFX vs VTSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMFX vs. VTSAX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMFX is a Buy and VTSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSAX has more cash in the bank: 1.7T vs. LAMFX (3.88B). VTSAX pays higher dividends than LAMFX: VTSAX (1.35) vs LAMFX (0.80). LAMFX was incepted earlier than VTSAX: LAMFX (18 years) vs VTSAX (24 years). LAMFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than VTSAX (0.04). LAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSAX (2.00). LAMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSAX: LAMFX (0) vs VTSAX (3000). VTSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. LAMFX (3.85). VTSAX return over 5 years is better than : 81.37 vs. LAMFX (53.72).
| LAMFX | VTSAX | LAMFX / VTSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.04 | 1,625% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.04 | 1,875% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.508 | -10.650 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.88B | 1.7T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.35 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.85 | 4.59 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.64 | 17.81 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.72 | 81.37 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.55 | 146.77 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...