Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMFX vs VTSMX
LAMFX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts LAMFX vs VTSMX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth F
Price$25.10
Change+$0.17 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.54B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$155.50
Change-$0.31 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95T
LAMFX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMFX vs. VTSMX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMFX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.95T vs. LAMFX (4.54B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than LAMFX: VTSMX (1.07) vs LAMFX (0.72). LAMFX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: LAMFX (18 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). LAMFX (0.74) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). LAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). LAMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: LAMFX (0) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.26 vs. LAMFX (10.12). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 85.31 vs. LAMFX (55.36).
| LAMFX | VTSMX | LAMFX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.14 | 457% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.14 | 529% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.602 | 10.550 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.54B | 1.95T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.07 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.12 | 18.26 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.46 | 63.95 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.36 | 85.31 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.90 | 224.80 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement