Ad is loading...
LAMHX vs VFFSX
LAMHX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMHX vs VFFSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R6
Price$21.90
Change+$1.59 (+7.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.65B
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$266.98
Change+$23.20 (+9.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32T
LAMHX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMHX vs. VFFSX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMHX is a Buy and VFFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.32T vs. LAMHX (3.65B). VFFSX pays higher dividends than LAMHX: VFFSX (1.36) vs LAMHX (0.89). LAMHX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: LAMHX (10 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). LAMHX (0.60) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). LAMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). LAMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: LAMHX (0) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.32 vs. LAMHX (-5.12). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 78.75 vs. LAMHX (48.98).
| LAMHX | VFFSX | LAMHX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.01 | 6,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.01 | 6,000% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.864 | -15.269 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.65B | 1.32T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 1.36 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.12 | -4.32 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.73 | 11.14 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.98 | 78.75 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...