Ad is loading...
LAMHX vs VTSMX
LAMHX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts LAMHX vs VTSMX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R6
Price$21.90
Change+$1.59 (+7.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.65B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$129.85
Change+$11.31 (+9.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7T
LAMHX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMHX vs. VTSMX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMHX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.7T vs. LAMHX (3.65B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than LAMHX: VTSMX (1.25) vs LAMHX (0.89). LAMHX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: LAMHX (10 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). LAMHX (0.60) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). LAMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). LAMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: LAMHX (0) vs VTSMX (3000). LAMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.12 vs. VTSMX (-5.43). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 75.41 vs. LAMHX (48.98).
| LAMHX | VTSMX | LAMHX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.14 | 429% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.14 | 429% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.864 | -15.905 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.65B | 1.7T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 1.25 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.12 | -5.43 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.73 | 8.73 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.98 | 75.41 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 131.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...