Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMHX vs VTSMX
LAMHX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts LAMHX vs VTSMX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R6
Price$26.20
Change-$0.11 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.69B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$160.44
Change-$0.75 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02T
LAMHX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMHX vs. VTSMX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMHX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 2.02T vs. LAMHX (4.7B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than LAMHX: VTSMX (1.04) vs LAMHX (0.81). LAMHX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: LAMHX (10 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). LAMHX (0.59) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). LAMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). LAMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: LAMHX (0) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.34 vs. LAMHX (10.45). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 89.06 vs. LAMHX (57.80).
| LAMHX | VTSMX | LAMHX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.14 | 421% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.14 | 421% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.681 | 14.389 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.7B | 2.02T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 1.04 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.45 | 18.34 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.70 | 82.05 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.80 | 89.06 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.69 | 231.08 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement