Advertisement
LAMR vs URE
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMR is a Hold and URE is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LAMR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
- LAMR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LAMR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- LAMR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
LAMR (@Specialty Telecommunications) experienced а -7.06% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was -1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.02%.
Reported Earning Dates
LAMR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Telecommunications (-1.04% weekly)Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
LAMR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LAMR | URE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 68% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 12 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 85% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BUFQ | 34.02 | 0.02 | +0.06% |
| FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF | |||
| AAPR | 27.54 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Innovator Eq Dfnd Prot ETF 2 YrToApl2026 | |||
| APOC | 25.73 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| Innovator Eq Dfnd Prt ETF - 6 Mo Apr/Oct | |||
| KBUF | 31.33 | -0.13 | -0.43% |
| KraneShares 90% KWEB Dfnd Outcm Jan27ETF | |||
| VALQ | 62.12 | -0.43 | -0.69% |
| American Century® U.S. Quality Value ETF | |||
LAMR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAMR has been closely correlated with OUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LAMR jumps, then OUT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LAMR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAMR | 100% | -0.45% | ||
| OUT - LAMR | 80% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| DBRG - LAMR | 67% Closely correlated | +3.60% | ||
| AKR - LAMR | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| KIM - LAMR | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| FRT - LAMR | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
More | ||||
URE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, URE has been closely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if URE jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To URE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| URE | 100% | N/A | ||
| FRT - URE | 78% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| NNN - URE | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.65% | ||
| Z - URE | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.03% | ||
| LAMR - URE | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.45% | ||
| REXR - URE | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.84% | ||
More | ||||