Ad is loading...
LAMRX vs VFFSX
LAMRX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMRX vs VFFSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R3
Price$20.92
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.88B
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$258.55
Change+$0.35 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32T
LAMRX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMRX vs. VFFSX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMRX is a Buy and VFFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.32T vs. LAMRX (3.88B). VFFSX pays higher dividends than LAMRX: VFFSX (1.36) vs LAMRX (0.42). LAMRX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: LAMRX (18 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). LAMRX (1.15) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). LAMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). LAMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: LAMRX (0) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.25 vs. LAMRX (3.24). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 83.93 vs. LAMRX (50.48).
| LAMRX | VFFSX | LAMRX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.01 | 11,500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.01 | 11,500% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.663 | -10.135 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.88B | 1.32T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 1.36 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.24 | 5.25 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.01 | 20.44 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.48 | 83.93 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...