Ad is loading...
LAMSX vs VTSMX
LAMSX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts LAMSX vs VTSMX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R4
Price$21.23
Change+$0.40 (+1.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.91B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$127.47
Change+$2.22 (+1.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7T
LAMSX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMSX vs. VTSMX commentary
Apr 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMSX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.7T vs. LAMSX (3.91B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than LAMSX: VTSMX (1.25) vs LAMSX (0.65). LAMSX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: LAMSX (10 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). LAMSX (0.90) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). LAMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). LAMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: LAMSX (0) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.08 vs. LAMSX (1.77). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 88.63 vs. LAMSX (57.13).
| LAMSX | VTSMX | LAMSX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.14 | 643% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.14 | 643% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.767 | -9.569 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.91B | 1.7T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.25 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.77 | 2.08 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.51 | 19.08 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.13 | 88.63 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 149.63 | - |