LANC
Price
$175.22
Change
+$0.22 (+0.13%)
Updated
Apr 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.67B
29 days until earnings call
MAMA
Price
$6.34
Change
-$0.17 (-2.61%)
Updated
Apr 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
186.68M
6 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LANC vs MAMA

Header iconLANC vs MAMA Comparison
Open Charts LANC vs MAMABanner chart's image
Lancaster Colony
Price$175.22
Change+$0.22 (+0.13%)
Volume$1.96K
Capitalization5.67B
Mama's Creations
Price$6.34
Change-$0.17 (-2.61%)
Volume$4.42K
Capitalization186.68M
LANC vs MAMA Comparison Chart
Loading...
LANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LANC vs. MAMA commentary
Apr 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LANC is a Hold and MAMA is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 02, 2025
Stock price -- (LANC: $175.00 vs. MAMA: $6.51)
Brand notoriety: LANC and MAMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LANC: 137% vs. MAMA: 115%
Market capitalization -- LANC: $5.67B vs. MAMA: $186.68M
LANC [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $5.67B. MAMA’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $186.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LANC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAMA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LANC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MAMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAMA is a better buy in the long-term than LANC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LANC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAMA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LANC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MAMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LANC is a better buy in the short-term than MAMA.

Price Growth

LANC (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.49% price change this week, while MAMA (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -1.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

LANC is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

MAMA is expected to report earnings on Jun 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.21% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LANC($5.67B) has a higher market cap than MAMA($187M). LANC has higher P/E ratio than MAMA: LANC (43.94) vs MAMA (26.24). LANC YTD gains are higher at: 1.577 vs. MAMA (-18.216). LANC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 244M vs. MAMA (9.86M). LANC has more cash in the bank: 134M vs. MAMA (5.56M). LANC has less debt than MAMA: LANC (13.3M) vs MAMA (15.2M). LANC has higher revenues than MAMA: LANC (1.87B) vs MAMA (96.4M).
LANCMAMALANC / MAMA
Capitalization5.67B187M3,033%
EBITDA244M9.86M2,474%
Gain YTD1.577-18.216-9%
P/E Ratio43.9426.24167%
Revenue1.87B96.4M1,937%
Total Cash134M5.56M2,410%
Total Debt13.3M15.2M88%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LANC vs MAMA: Fundamental Ratings
LANC
MAMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8321
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5527
SMR RATING
1..100
5251
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7258
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
824
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LANC's Valuation (60) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MAMA (89) in the null industry. This means that LANC’s stock grew similarly to MAMA’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as LANC (55) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as LANC (52) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as LANC (72) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LANC (82) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew significantly faster than LANC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LANCMAMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UOCT34.550.11
+0.32%
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buf ETF™ Oct
IBDS24.180.01
+0.04%
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corp ETF
NML9.00-0.03
-0.33%
Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund
KROP9.95-0.05
-0.50%
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF
CANC24.08-0.44
-1.81%
Tema Oncology ETF

LANC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LANC has been loosely correlated with JBSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LANC jumps, then JBSS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LANC
1D Price
Change %
LANC100%
+0.12%
JBSS - LANC
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
SENEA - LANC
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
FLO - LANC
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
JJSF - LANC
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
MDLZ - LANC
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
More

MAMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAMA and DAR have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAMA and DAR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAMA
1D Price
Change %
MAMA100%
+2.68%
DAR - MAMA
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
BRBR - MAMA
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
LANC - MAMA
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
NOMD - MAMA
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
JVA - MAMA
22%
Poorly correlated
+9.57%
More