Advertisement
MAMA vs NOMD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAMA is a Buy and NOMD is a Buy.
MAMA sees its Stochastic Oscillator climbs out of oversold territory
On October 27, 2026, the Stochastic Oscillator for MAMA moved out of oversold territory and this could be a bullish sign for the stock. Traders may want to buy the stock or buy call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 57 instances where the indicator left the oversold zone. In 51 of the 57 cases the stock moved higher in the following days. This puts the odds of a move higher at over 89%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 28, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on MAMA as a result. In 85 of 103 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for MAMA just turned positive on October 02, 2026. Looking at past instances where MAMA's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 29 of 39 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
Following a +6.12% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MAMA advanced for three days, in 231 of 279 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
MAMA may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 50-day moving average for MAMA moved below the 200-day moving average on October 08, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MAMA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 76%.
The Aroon Indicator for MAMA entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 37 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 61 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. MAMA’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 76 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 78 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 93 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.664) is normal, around the industry mean (1.736). MAMA's P/E Ratio (72.278) is considerably higher than the industry average of (6.461). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.370) is also within normal values, averaging (8.458). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.056) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.987) is also within normal values, averaging (4.925).
NOMD's MACD Histogram just turned positive
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for NOMD turned positive on October 02, 2026. Looking at past instances where NOMD's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 30 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 05, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on NOMD as a result. In 45 of 86 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 52%.
NOMD moved above its 50-day moving average on October 12, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for NOMD crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 19, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 8 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
Following a +3.89% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NOMD advanced for three days, in 166 of 294 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 56%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for NOMD moved out of overbought territory on October 23, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 32 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 17 of the 32 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 53%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 41 of 65 cases where NOMD's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 63%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NOMD declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 61%.
NOMD broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for NOMD entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 6 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 43 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. NOMD’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 49 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.655) is normal, around the industry mean (1.736). P/E Ratio (13.552) is within average values for comparable stocks, (6.461). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.650) is also within normal values, averaging (8.458). Dividend Yield (0.058) settles around the average of (0.056) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.462) is also within normal values, averaging (4.925).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 83 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. NOMD’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock worse than average.
MAMA | NOMD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 37 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NOMD's Valuation (49) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAMA (93) in the null industry. This means that NOMD’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAMA’s over the last 12 months.
MAMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOMD (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOMD’s over the last 12 months.
MAMA's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as NOMD (83) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to NOMD’s over the last 12 months.
NOMD's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MAMA (61) in the null industry. This means that NOMD’s stock grew similarly to MAMA’s over the last 12 months.
NOMD's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAMA (76) in the null industry. This means that NOMD’s stock grew significantly faster than MAMA’s over the last 12 months.
| MAMA | NOMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 13 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 1 day ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 50% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MAMA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while NOMD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MAMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NOMD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MAMA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOMD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MAMA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- NOMD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MAMA (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +1.01% price change this week, while NOMD (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -0.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -21.11%.
Reported Earning Dates
MAMA is expected to report earnings on Dec 14, 2026.
NOMD is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (-1.58% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
Advertisement
MAMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MAMA and HLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAMA and HLF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAMA | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| HLF - MAMA | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.67% | ||
| DAR - MAMA | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
| NOMD - MAMA | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
| LW - MAMA | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
| CENT - MAMA | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.44% | ||
More | ||||
NOMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOMD has been loosely correlated with MDLZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOMD jumps, then MDLZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NOMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOMD | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| MDLZ - NOMD | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| KHC - NOMD | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| GIS - NOMD | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| CAG - NOMD | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.25% | ||
| MKC - NOMD | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.99% | ||
More | ||||