Ad is loading...
LAVFX vs RMFCX
LAVFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVFX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F
Price$13.93
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.77B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.51B
LAVFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVFX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 96.5B vs. LAVFX (1.77B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVFX: RMFCX (1.34) vs LAVFX (0.99). LAVFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVFX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVFX (0.79). LAVFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.60 vs. LAVFX (0.08). LAVFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.96 vs. RMFCX (48.78).
| LAVFX | RMFCX | LAVFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.91 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.91 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.005 | -3.342 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 96.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.34 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.08 | 3.60 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.93 | 5.79 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.96 | 48.78 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.34 | 52.90 | 21% |