Ad is loading...
LAVFX vs RMFCX
LAVFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVFX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F
Price$15.02
Change+$0.34 (+2.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.87B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$56.18
Change+$1.19 (+2.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.86B
LAVFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVFX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVFX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. LAVFX (1.87B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVFX: RMFCX (1.37) vs LAVFX (1.02). LAVFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVFX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVFX (0.80). LAVFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.10 vs. LAVFX (1.08). LAVFX return over 5 years is better than : 66.30 vs. RMFCX (60.36).
| LAVFX | RMFCX | LAVFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.945 | 1.050 | -90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 101B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.37 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.08 | 4.10 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.89 | 16.28 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.30 | 60.36 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.65 | 58.87 | 28% |