Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVFX vs RMFCX
LAVFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVFX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F
Price$16.62
Change-$0.10 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.1B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.89
Change-$0.48 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.34B
LAVFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVFX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAVFX (2.1B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVFX: RMFCX (1.24) vs LAVFX (0.91). LAVFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVFX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVFX (0.80). LAVFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAVFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.75 vs. RMFCX (6.02). LAVFX return over 5 years is better than : 66.85 vs. RMFCX (62.19).
| LAVFX | RMFCX | LAVFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.821 | 12.543 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.1B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.75 | 6.02 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.31 | 40.53 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.85 | 62.19 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.79 | 103.10 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement