Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVFX vs RMFCX
LAVFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVFX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F
Price$16.06
Change+$0.15 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.41
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
LAVFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVFX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAVFX (2.04B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVFX: RMFCX (1.27) vs LAVFX (0.95). LAVFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVFX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVFX (0.80). LAVFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.38 vs. LAVFX (9.02). RMFCX (60.49) and LAVFX (58.58) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVFX | RMFCX | LAVFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.367 | 11.347 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.27 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.02 | 11.38 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.54 | 30.87 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.58 | 60.49 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.61 | 81.82 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement