Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVFX vs RMFCX
LAVFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVFX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F
Price$16.44
Change+$0.12 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
LAVFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVFX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAVFX (2.08B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVFX: RMFCX (1.24) vs LAVFX (0.91). LAVFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVFX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVFX (0.80). LAVFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAVFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.32 vs. RMFCX (7.71). RMFCX (56.41) and LAVFX (55.91) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVFX | RMFCX | LAVFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.931 | 11.421 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.32 | 7.71 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.74 | 32.16 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.91 | 56.41 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.65 | 91.12 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement