Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVFX vs RMFCX
LAVFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVFX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F
Price$16.04
Change-$0.10 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.07
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
LAVFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVFX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LAVFX (2.04B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVFX: RMFCX (1.26) vs LAVFX (0.93). LAVFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVFX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVFX (0.80). LAVFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX (7.77) and LAVFX (7.61) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX (54.95) and LAVFX (53.06) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVFX | RMFCX | LAVFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.907 | 10.721 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 110B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.61 | 7.77 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.77 | 22.69 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.06 | 54.95 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.87 | 79.02 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers