Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVFX vs RMFCX
LAVFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVFX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F
Price$15.07
Change-$0.15 (-0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.6B
LAVFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVFX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. LAVFX (1.93B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVFX: RMFCX (1.31) vs LAVFX (0.98). LAVFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVFX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVFX (0.80). LAVFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. LAVFX (5.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. LAVFX (55.50).
| LAVFX | RMFCX | LAVFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.699 | 6.021 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 107B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 1.31 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.88 | 8.70 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.89 | 28.43 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.50 | 59.85 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.58 | 69.75 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement