Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVFX vs RMFCX
LAVFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVFX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F
Price$16.70
Change-$0.04 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
LAVFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVFX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LAVFX (2.07B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVFX: RMFCX (1.21) vs LAVFX (0.88). LAVFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVFX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVFX (0.80). LAVFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. LAVFX (4.05). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. LAVFX (49.15).
| LAVFX | RMFCX | LAVFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.955 | 12.783 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 110B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.21 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.05 | 6.00 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.04 | 27.94 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.15 | 52.67 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.94 | 84.73 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement