Ad is loading...
LAVFX vs RMFCX
LAVFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVFX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F
Price$14.58
Change-$0.08 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.88B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.21
Change-$0.57 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.33B
LAVFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVFX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 102B vs. LAVFX (1.88B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVFX: RMFCX (1.30) vs LAVFX (0.95). LAVFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVFX (17 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVFX (0.79). LAVFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.61 vs. LAVFX (4.00). LAVFX (79.91) and RMFCX (77.01) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVFX | RMFCX | LAVFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.91 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.91 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.080 | 1.136 | -95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.88B | 102B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.30 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.00 | 5.61 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.35 | 15.62 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.91 | 77.01 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.38 | 64.83 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...