Ad is loading...
LAVFX vs RMFEX
LAVFX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAVFX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F
Price$15.02
Change+$0.34 (+2.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.87B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$56.54
Change+$1.20 (+2.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.86B
LAVFX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVFX vs. RMFEX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVFX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. LAVFX (1.87B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAVFX: RMFEX (1.65) vs LAVFX (1.02). LAVFX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAVFX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAVFX (0.80) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAVFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAVFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAVFX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.43 vs. LAVFX (1.08). LAVFX return over 5 years is better than : 66.30 vs. RMFEX (62.84).
| LAVFX | RMFEX | LAVFX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.62 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.62 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.945 | 1.154 | -82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 101B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.65 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.08 | 4.43 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.89 | 17.36 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.30 | 62.84 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.65 | 64.99 | 26% |