Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVPX vs RMFEX
LAVPX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$16.59
Change+$0.05 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.09B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.83
Change+$0.28 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.75B
LAVPX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. LAVPX (2.09B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFEX (1.46) vs LAVPX (0.57). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAVPX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.17 vs. LAVPX (6.45). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 63.21 vs. LAVPX (54.94).
| LAVPX | RMFEX | LAVPX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.165 | 15.672 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.09B | 113B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 1.46 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.45 | 8.17 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.94 | 39.09 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.94 | 63.21 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.30 | 98.71 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement