Ad is loading...
LAVPX vs RMFEX
LAVPX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$14.81
Change+$0.13 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.89B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$56.29
Change+$0.18 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.3B
LAVPX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Buy and RMFEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 102B vs. LAVPX (1.89B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFEX (1.61) vs LAVPX (0.64). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAVPX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.88 vs. LAVPX (2.21). LAVPX return over 5 years is better than : 83.64 vs. RMFEX (78.86).
| LAVPX | RMFEX | LAVPX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.62 | 184% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.62 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.136 | 2.891 | 5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.89B | 102B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 1.61 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.21 | 6.88 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.66 | 12.57 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.64 | 78.86 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.73 | 72.06 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...