Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVPX vs RMFEX
LAVPX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$14.88
Change-$0.14 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$57.86
Change-$0.45 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
LAVPX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. LAVPX (1.92B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFEX (1.58) vs LAVPX (0.64). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAVPX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.03 vs. LAVPX (4.47). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 62.32 vs. LAVPX (51.89).
| LAVPX | RMFEX | LAVPX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.501 | 6.152 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 106B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 1.58 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.47 | 9.03 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.39 | 29.63 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.89 | 62.32 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.43 | 76.27 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement