Ad is loading...
LAVPX vs RMFEX
LAVPX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$14.08
Change+$0.17 (+1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$54.07
Change+$0.73 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.26B
LAVPX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 97.3B vs. LAVPX (1.79B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFEX (1.61) vs LAVPX (0.64). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAVPX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.18 vs. LAVPX (-1.09). RMFEX (56.67) and LAVPX (54.34) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVPX | RMFEX | LAVPX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.62 | 184% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.62 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.116 | -1.167 | 438% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 97.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 1.61 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.09 | 4.18 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.04 | 10.64 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.34 | 56.67 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.14 | 61.98 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...