Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVPX vs RMFEX
LAVPX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$14.67
Change-$0.04 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.9B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$56.37
Change-$0.15 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.21B
LAVPX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFEX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. LAVPX (1.9B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFEX (1.65) vs LAVPX (0.66). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAVPX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.55 vs. LAVPX (2.57). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 61.67 vs. LAVPX (56.74).
| LAVPX | RMFEX | LAVPX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.341 | 3.037 | 11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.9B | 103B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.65 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.57 | 5.55 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.15 | 19.57 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.74 | 61.67 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.02 | 67.98 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement