Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVPX vs RMFEX
LAVPX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$15.83
Change-$0.09 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.46
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
LAVPX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LAVPX (2.03B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFEX (1.51) vs LAVPX (0.60). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAVPX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. LAVPX (6.54). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.34 vs. LAVPX (50.18).
| LAVPX | RMFEX | LAVPX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.981 | 10.922 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 110B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.51 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.54 | 8.10 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.87 | 23.84 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.18 | 57.34 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.91 | 86.04 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement