Ad is loading...
LAVQX vs RMFCX
LAVQX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVQX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R2
Price$13.77
Change+$0.23 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.77B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.96
Change+$0.76 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.18B
LAVQX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVQX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVQX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 97.2B vs. LAVQX (1.77B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVQX: RMFCX (1.34) vs LAVQX (0.55). LAVQX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVQX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVQX (1.29) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVQX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.87 vs. LAVQX (-2.80). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.32 vs. LAVQX (49.41).
| LAVQX | RMFCX | LAVQX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.91 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.91 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.749 | -2.681 | 214% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 97.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.34 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.80 | 1.87 | -149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.55 | 6.27 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.41 | 53.32 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.04 | 54.78 | 15% |