Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVQX vs RMFCX
LAVQX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVQX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R2
Price$14.56
Change-$0.06 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.89B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.88
Change-$0.13 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.7B
LAVQX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVQX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVQX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. LAVQX (1.89B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVQX: RMFCX (1.37) vs LAVQX (0.56). LAVQX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVQX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVQX (1.30) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVQX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.10 vs. LAVQX (2.71). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.80 vs. LAVQX (54.84).
| LAVQX | RMFCX | LAVQX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.91 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.91 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.342 | 2.685 | -13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.89B | 103B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.37 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.71 | 6.10 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.43 | 17.68 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.84 | 58.80 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.07 | 63.05 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement