Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVRX vs RMFEX
LAVRX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAVRX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R3
Price$14.90
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$57.70
Change-$0.05 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.31B
LAVRX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVRX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVRX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LAVRX (1.92B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAVRX: RMFEX (1.58) vs LAVRX (0.60). LAVRX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAVRX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAVRX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAVRX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.80 vs. LAVRX (4.64). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 53.30 vs. LAVRX (41.73).
| LAVRX | RMFEX | LAVRX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.62 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.62 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.635 | 5.559 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 105B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.58 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.64 | 8.80 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.53 | 19.58 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.73 | 53.30 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.69 | 76.28 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement