Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVRX vs RMFEX
LAVRX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAVRX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R3
Price$16.60
Change-$0.04 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.48
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
LAVRX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVRX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVRX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. LAVRX (2.11B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAVRX: RMFEX (1.46) vs LAVRX (0.54). LAVRX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAVRX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAVRX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAVRX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX (8.45) and LAVRX (8.32) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 61.73 vs. LAVRX (56.03).
| LAVRX | RMFEX | LAVRX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.62 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.62 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.351 | 15.028 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 113B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 1.46 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.32 | 8.45 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.59 | 44.96 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.03 | 61.73 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.84 | 101.65 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement