Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVRX vs RMFEX
LAVRX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAVRX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R3
Price$15.79
Change-$0.09 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.50
Change-$0.29 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
LAVRX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVRX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVRX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAVRX (2.04B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAVRX: RMFEX (1.53) vs LAVRX (0.58). LAVRX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAVRX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAVRX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAVRX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.38 vs. LAVRX (6.90). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 61.34 vs. LAVRX (54.45).
| LAVRX | RMFEX | LAVRX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.62 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.62 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.174 | 11.527 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.53 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.90 | 10.38 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.74 | 28.75 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.45 | 61.34 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.36 | 87.16 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement