Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVRX vs RMFEX
LAVRX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAVRX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R3
Price$15.60
Change+$0.10 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$59.82
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
LAVRX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVRX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVRX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAVRX (2B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAVRX: RMFEX (1.53) vs LAVRX (0.58). LAVRX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAVRX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAVRX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAVRX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.81 vs. LAVRX (8.73). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 64.33 vs. LAVRX (58.38).
| LAVRX | RMFEX | LAVRX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.62 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.62 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.267 | 9.748 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.53 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.73 | 11.81 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.55 | 30.45 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.38 | 64.33 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.80 | 86.20 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers