Ad is loading...
LAVRX vs RMFEX
LAVRX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAVRX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R3
Price$13.93
Change+$0.18 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.77B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$53.34
Change+$0.55 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.25B
LAVRX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVRX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVRX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 96.2B vs. LAVRX (1.77B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAVRX: RMFEX (1.61) vs LAVRX (0.60). LAVRX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAVRX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAVRX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAVRX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.70 vs. LAVRX (-2.61). RMFEX (52.96) and LAVRX (52.34) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVRX | RMFEX | LAVRX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.62 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.62 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.335 | -3.507 | 181% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 96.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.61 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.61 | 1.70 | -154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.42 | 8.21 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.34 | 52.96 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.74 | 57.52 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...