Ad is loading...
LAVSX vs RMFCX
LAVSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVSX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R4
Price$14.38
Change+$0.17 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.74
Change+$0.73 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.26B
LAVSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 97.3B vs. LAVSX (1.79B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVSX: RMFCX (1.34) vs LAVSX (0.87). LAVSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVSX (0.94) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . LAVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.87 vs. LAVSX (-0.70). LAVSX (56.19) and RMFCX (54.30) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVSX | RMFCX | LAVSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.013 | -1.247 | 402% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 97.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.34 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.70 | 3.87 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.70 | 9.64 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.19 | 54.30 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 55.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...