Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVSX vs RMFCX
LAVSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVSX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R4
Price$16.96
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.1B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.21
Change+$0.11 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
LAVSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. LAVSX (2.1B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVSX: RMFCX (1.20) vs LAVSX (0.78). LAVSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVSX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . LAVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAVSX (8.10) and RMFCX (7.84) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX (58.89) and LAVSX (57.05) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVSX | RMFCX | LAVSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.302 | 14.983 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.1B | 113B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 1.20 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.10 | 7.84 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.19 | 43.87 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.05 | 58.89 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.66 | 94.24 | 43% |