Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVSX vs RMFCX
LAVSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVSX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R4
Price$16.58
Change+$0.13 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
LAVSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAVSX (2.08B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVSX: RMFCX (1.24) vs LAVSX (0.80). LAVSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVSX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . LAVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAVSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.20 vs. RMFCX (7.71). RMFCX (56.41) and LAVSX (55.59) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVSX | RMFCX | LAVSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.829 | 11.421 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.24 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.20 | 7.71 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.43 | 32.16 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.59 | 56.41 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.86 | 91.12 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement