Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVSX vs RMFCX
LAVSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVSX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R4
Price$15.90
Change+$0.08 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.67
Change+$0.23 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.88B
LAVSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAVSX (1.99B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVSX: RMFCX (1.27) vs LAVSX (0.83). LAVSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVSX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . LAVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.53 vs. LAVSX (6.70). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.81 vs. LAVSX (52.93).
| LAVSX | RMFCX | LAVSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.749 | 9.560 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.27 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.70 | 9.53 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.78 | 28.90 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.93 | 55.81 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.97 | 80.85 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement