Ad is loading...
LAVVX vs RMFEX
LAVVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAVVX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R6
Price$15.23
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.87B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$55.34
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.86B
LAVVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVVX vs. RMFEX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVVX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. LAVVX (1.87B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAVVX: RMFEX (1.65) vs LAVVX (1.08). LAVVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAVVX (10 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAVVX (0.63) and RMFEX (0.62) have similar cost to investors . LAVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAVVX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.72 vs. LAVVX (1.94). LAVVX (59.64) and RMFEX (58.22) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVVX | RMFEX | LAVVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.62 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.62 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.846 | 1.154 | -73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 101B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.65 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.94 | 4.72 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.35 | 18.36 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.64 | 58.22 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...