Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVVX vs RMFEX
LAVVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAVVX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R6
Price$15.78
Change+$0.15 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$58.02
Change+$0.32 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
LAVVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVVX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LAVVX (1.92B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAVVX: RMFEX (1.58) vs LAVVX (1.04). LAVVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAVVX (10 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAVVX (0.63) and RMFEX (0.62) have similar cost to investors . LAVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAVVX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.37 vs. LAVVX (5.53). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 54.01 vs. LAVVX (45.40).
| LAVVX | RMFEX | LAVVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.62 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.62 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.758 | 6.053 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 105B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.58 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.53 | 9.37 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.95 | 18.90 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.40 | 54.01 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement