Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVYX vs RMFCX
LAVYX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVYX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity I
Price$17.25
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.1B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.21
Change+$0.11 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
LAVYX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVYX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVYX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. LAVYX (2.1B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVYX: RMFCX (1.20) vs LAVYX (0.95). LAVYX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVYX (23 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVYX (0.70). LAVYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAVYX: RMFCX (250) vs LAVYX (1000000). LAVYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.44 vs. RMFCX (7.84). RMFCX (58.89) and LAVYX (58.67) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVYX | RMFCX | LAVYX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.496 | 14.983 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.1B | 113B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.20 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.44 | 7.84 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.17 | 43.87 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.67 | 58.89 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.78 | 94.24 | 46% |