Ad is loading...
LAVYX vs RMFCX
LAVYX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVYX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity I
Price$14.52
Change+$0.97 (+7.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.67B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.56
Change+$3.33 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.3B
LAVYX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVYX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVYX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 98.3B vs. LAVYX (1.67B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVYX: RMFCX (1.34) vs LAVYX (1.06). LAVYX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVYX (22 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVYX (0.69). LAVYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAVYX: RMFCX (250) vs LAVYX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.43 vs. LAVYX (-8.57). RMFCX (45.42) and LAVYX (44.98) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVYX | RMFCX | LAVYX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.797 | -7.697 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.67B | 98.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.34 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.57 | -4.43 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.70 | -0.65 | -262% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.98 | 45.42 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.72 | 46.29 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...