Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVYX vs RMFCX
LAVYX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVYX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity I
Price$15.60
Change+$0.16 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
LAVYX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVYX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVYX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LAVYX (1.92B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVYX: RMFCX (1.31) vs LAVYX (1.05). LAVYX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVYX (22 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVYX (0.70). LAVYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAVYX: RMFCX (250) vs LAVYX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. LAVYX (5.31). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.66 vs. LAVYX (44.55).
| LAVYX | RMFCX | LAVYX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.646 | 5.919 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 105B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.31 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.31 | 9.01 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.40 | 17.82 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.55 | 51.66 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.39 | 70.47 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement