Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVYX vs RMFCX
LAVYX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVYX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity I
Price$15.81
Change+$0.14 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$58.27
Change+$0.43 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.24B
LAVYX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVYX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVYX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. LAVYX (1.94B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVYX: RMFCX (1.31) vs LAVYX (1.05). LAVYX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVYX (22 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVYX (0.70). LAVYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAVYX: RMFCX (250) vs LAVYX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.64 vs. LAVYX (6.74). RMFCX (63.87) and LAVYX (61.96) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVYX | RMFCX | LAVYX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.160 | 7.403 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 106B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.31 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.74 | 9.64 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.29 | 26.42 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.96 | 63.87 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.58 | 76.11 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement