LAZ
Price
$48.63
Change
-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.59B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
MS
Price
$158.67
Change
-$1.35 (-0.84%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
252.44B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAZ vs MS

Header iconLAZ vs MS Comparison
Open Charts LAZ vs MSBanner chart's image
Lazard
Price$48.63
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Volume$563.2K
Capitalization4.59B
Morgan Stanley
Price$158.67
Change-$1.35 (-0.84%)
Volume$7.97M
Capitalization252.44B
LAZ vs MS Comparison Chart in %
LAZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAZ vs. MS commentary
Oct 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAZ is a Hold and MS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 20, 2025
Stock price -- (LAZ: $48.63 vs. MS: $158.67)
Brand notoriety: LAZ: Not notable vs. MS: Notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAZ: 70% vs. MS: 145%
Market capitalization -- LAZ: $4.59B vs. MS: $252.44B
LAZ [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.59B. MS’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $252.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMS’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • LAZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, MS is a better buy in the long-term than LAZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MS is a better buy in the short-term than LAZ.

Price Growth

LAZ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.61% price change this week, while MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +4.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +84.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

MS is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.26% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MS($252B) has a higher market cap than LAZ($4.59B). LAZ (16.65) and MS (16.27) have similar P/E ratio . MS YTD gains are higher at: 28.958 vs. LAZ (-2.503). MS has more cash in the bank: 4.29B vs. LAZ (1.22B). LAZ has less debt than MS: LAZ (2.21B) vs MS (352B). MS has higher revenues than LAZ: MS (61.5B) vs LAZ (3.08B).
LAZMSLAZ / MS
Capitalization4.59B252B2%
EBITDA538MN/A-
Gain YTD-2.50328.958-9%
P/E Ratio16.6516.27102%
Revenue3.08B61.5B5%
Total Cash1.22B4.29B28%
Total Debt2.21B352B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAZ vs MS: Fundamental Ratings
LAZ
MS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5289
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4811
SMR RATING
1..100
195
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5917
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9458
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LAZ's Valuation (19) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (28). This means that LAZ’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LAZ (48). This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

MS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LAZ (19). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Price Growth Rating (17) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LAZ (59). This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

MS's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LAZ (94). This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LAZMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSIYX23.050.15
+0.66%
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps R6
TEPSX35.380.07
+0.20%
ProFunds Technology UltraSector Svc
IRGFX24.48-0.12
-0.49%
Macquarie Small Cap Growth R6
PRUQX17.58-0.10
-0.57%
PGIM Jennison Utility R6
ISCCX33.65-0.20
-0.59%
Federated Hermes Intl Small-Mid Co C