LAZ
Price
$51.88
Change
+$0.67 (+1.31%)
Updated
Aug 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.66B
79 days until earnings call
PWP
Price
$22.20
Change
+$0.35 (+1.60%)
Updated
Aug 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
727.72M
86 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAZ vs PWP

Header iconLAZ vs PWP Comparison
Open Charts LAZ vs PWPBanner chart's image
Lazard
Price$51.88
Change+$0.67 (+1.31%)
Volume$7.91K
Capitalization3.66B
Perella Weinberg Partners
Price$22.20
Change+$0.35 (+1.60%)
Volume$16.58K
Capitalization727.72M
LAZ vs PWP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LAZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAZ vs. PWP commentary
Aug 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAZ is a Buy and PWP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LAZ: $51.21 vs. PWP: $21.85)
Brand notoriety: LAZ and PWP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAZ: 84% vs. PWP: 164%
Market capitalization -- LAZ: $3.66B vs. PWP: $727.72M
LAZ [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.66B. PWP’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $727.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePWP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LAZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PWP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LAZ and PWP are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PWP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWP is a better buy in the short-term than LAZ.

Price Growth

LAZ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -4.79% price change this week, while PWP (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +5.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

PWP is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.47% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAZ($3.66B) has a higher market cap than PWP($728M). LAZ YTD gains are higher at: 2.670 vs. PWP (-7.745). LAZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 40.9M vs. PWP (-97.87M). LAZ has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. PWP (338M). PWP has less debt than LAZ: PWP (176M) vs LAZ (2.18B). LAZ has higher revenues than PWP: LAZ (2.55B) vs PWP (649M).
LAZPWPLAZ / PWP
Capitalization3.66B728M503%
EBITDA40.9M-97.87M-42%
Gain YTD2.670-7.745-34%
P/E Ratio16.44N/A-
Revenue2.55B649M393%
Total Cash1.19B338M352%
Total Debt2.18B176M1,236%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAZ: Fundamental Ratings
LAZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LAZPWP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LINRX20.97N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett International Opp R3
MMPCX20.49N/A
N/A
NYLI WMC Value Class C
FNIAX46.20N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor New Insights A
LCGNX29.03N/A
N/A
William Blair Large Cap Growth N
HWCAX29.59N/A
N/A
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value A