Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RMFCX
LBDRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$22.42
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.24M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
LBDRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LBDRX (93.2M). RMFCX (1.21) and LBDRX (1.17) have matching dividends . LBDRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBDRX (12 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LBDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LBDRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. LBDRX (-1.31). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. LBDRX (32.56).
| LBDRX | RMFCX | LBDRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.91 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.91 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.050 | 12.783 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.2M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.21 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.31 | 6.00 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.39 | 27.94 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.56 | 52.67 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.83 | 84.73 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers