Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RMFCX
LBDRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$21.66
Change+$0.27 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.05M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.06
Change+$0.59 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.67B
LBDRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LBDRX (93M). RMFCX (1.26) and LBDRX (1.22) have matching dividends . LBDRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBDRX (12 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LBDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LBDRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.53 vs. LBDRX (4.27). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.07 vs. LBDRX (33.47).
| LBDRX | RMFCX | LBDRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.91 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.91 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.950 | 10.702 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.26 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.27 | 10.53 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.09 | 23.41 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.47 | 55.07 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.89 | 79.34 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement