Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RMFEX
LBDRX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RMFEX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$20.92
Change+$0.21 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets89.97M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$58.62
Change+$0.43 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.24B
LBDRX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. LBDRX (90M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBDRX: RMFEX (1.58) vs LBDRX (1.27). LBDRX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBDRX (11 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LBDRX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.98 vs. LBDRX (3.29). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 66.41 vs. LBDRX (41.59).
| LBDRX | RMFEX | LBDRX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.62 | 226% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.62 | 245% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.550 | 7.546 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.58 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.29 | 9.98 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.60 | 27.58 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.59 | 66.41 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.15 | 82.97 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers