Ad is loading...
LBDRX vs RMFEX
LBDRX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RMFEX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$21.18
Change+$0.14 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets215.69M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$57.41
Change+$0.39 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.76B
LBDRX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LBDRX (216M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBDRX: RMFEX (1.95) vs LBDRX (1.19). LBDRX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBDRX (11 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFEX (25.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LBDRX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.15 vs. LBDRX (12.00). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 47.35 vs. LBDRX (19.77).
| LBDRX | RMFEX | LBDRX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.200 | 4.534 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 216M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.95 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.00 | 14.15 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.35 | 17.09 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.77 | 47.35 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.37 | 76.58 | 29% |