Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RMFEX
LBDRX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RMFEX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$21.29
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.53M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$59.78
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.83B
LBDRX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LBDRX (92.5M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBDRX: RMFEX (1.53) vs LBDRX (1.23). LBDRX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBDRX (11 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LBDRX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.27 vs. LBDRX (1.48). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 59.51 vs. LBDRX (36.71).
| LBDRX | RMFEX | LBDRX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.62 | 226% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.62 | 245% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.450 | 9.675 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.5M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.53 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.48 | 9.27 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.00 | 30.23 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.71 | 59.51 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.70 | 83.90 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement