Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RMFEX
LBDRX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RMFEX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$21.66
Change+$0.27 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.05M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.45
Change+$0.59 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.67B
LBDRX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LBDRX (93M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBDRX: RMFEX (1.51) vs LBDRX (1.22). LBDRX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBDRX (12 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LBDRX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.89 vs. LBDRX (4.27). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.46 vs. LBDRX (33.47).
| LBDRX | RMFEX | LBDRX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.62 | 226% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.62 | 245% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.950 | 10.904 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.51 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.27 | 10.89 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.09 | 24.57 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.47 | 57.46 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.89 | 86.37 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement