Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RWMHX
LBDRX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RWMHX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$22.42
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.24M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.12
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
LBDRX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RWMHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. LBDRX (93.2M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than LBDRX: RWMHX (1.33) vs LBDRX (1.17). LBDRX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LBDRX (12 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). LBDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMHX: LBDRX (0) vs RWMHX (250). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.48 vs. LBDRX (-1.31). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.42 vs. LBDRX (32.56).
| LBDRX | RWMHX | LBDRX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.41 | 341% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.41 | 371% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.050 | 8.808 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.2M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.33 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.31 | 4.48 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.39 | 29.53 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.56 | 44.42 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.83 | 71.77 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement