LBLCF
Price
$135.11
Change
-$1.35 (-0.99%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
MSS
Price
$1.31
Change
+$0.15 (+12.93%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:24 PM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

LBLCF vs MSS

Header iconLBLCF vs MSS Comparison
Open Charts LBLCF vs MSSBanner chart's image
Loblaw Companies
Price$135.11
Change-$1.35 (-0.99%)
Volume$506
CapitalizationN/A
Maison Solutions
Price$1.31
Change+$0.15 (+12.93%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
LBLCF vs MSS Comparison Chart
Loading...
LBLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LBLCF vs. MSS commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBLCF is a StrongBuy and MSS is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (LBLCF: $135.11 vs. MSS: $1.16)
Brand notoriety: LBLCF and MSS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LBLCF: 17% vs. MSS: 3778%
Market capitalization -- LBLCF: $27.92B vs. MSS: $26.39M
LBLCF [@Food Retail] is valued at $27.92B. MSS’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $26.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $41.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $11.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LBLCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LBLCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MSS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LBLCF is a better buy in the long-term than MSS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LBLCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LBLCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MSS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LBLCF is a better buy in the short-term than MSS.

Price Growth

LBLCF (@Food Retail) experienced а -0.65% price change this week, while MSS (@Food Retail) price change was +18.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was -1.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.59%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Retail (-1.54% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LBLCF($27.9B) has a higher market cap than MSS($26.4M). LBLCF has higher P/E ratio than MSS: LBLCF (18.80) vs MSS (17.00). LBLCF YTD gains are higher at: 39.734 vs. MSS (-15.328). LBLCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.46B vs. MSS (67K). LBLCF has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. MSS (9.41M). MSS has less debt than LBLCF: MSS (25.8M) vs LBLCF (18B). LBLCF has higher revenues than MSS: LBLCF (58.1B) vs MSS (55.3M).
LBLCFMSSLBLCF / MSS
Capitalization27.9B26.4M105,682%
EBITDA6.46B67K9,638,806%
Gain YTD39.734-15.328-259%
P/E Ratio18.8017.00111%
Revenue58.1B55.3M105,063%
Total Cash1.74B9.41M18,497%
Total Debt18B25.8M69,767%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LBLCF: Fundamental Ratings
LBLCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
34
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3
SMR RATING
1..100
47
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LBLCFMSS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LBLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RWM18.190.22
+1.22%
ProShares Short Russell2000
AGIH24.73N/A
N/A
iShares Inflation Hdg U.S. Aggt Bd ETF
LRNZ41.79-0.16
-0.37%
TrueShares Tech, AI and Deep Lrng ETF
FDT54.35-0.39
-0.71%
First Trust Dev Mkts Ex-US AlphaDEX® ETF
FIW106.28-0.96
-0.90%
First Trust Water ETF

LBLCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LBLCF and WNGRF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBLCF and WNGRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBLCF
1D Price
Change %
LBLCF100%
-0.99%
WNGRF - LBLCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.36%
CRRFY - LBLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASAI - LBLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.92%
MSS - LBLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+13.73%
MTRAF - LBLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.16%
More

MSS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSS and LBLCF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSS and LBLCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSS
1D Price
Change %
MSS100%
+13.73%
LBLCF - MSS
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
ASAI - MSS
14%
Poorly correlated
+2.92%
SVNDY - MSS
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
DDL - MSS
13%
Poorly correlated
+7.07%
ADRNY - MSS
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
More