LBLCF
Price
$44.56
Change
-$0.17 (-0.38%)
Updated
Nov 26 closing price
Capitalization
52.21B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MTRAF
Price
$71.47
Change
+$0.60 (+0.85%)
Updated
Nov 26 closing price
Capitalization
15.35B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LBLCF vs MTRAF

Header iconLBLCF vs MTRAF Comparison
Open Charts LBLCF vs MTRAFBanner chart's image
Loblaw Companies
Price$44.56
Change-$0.17 (-0.38%)
Volume$5.52K
Capitalization52.21B
Metro
Price$71.47
Change+$0.60 (+0.85%)
Volume$10.6K
Capitalization15.35B
LBLCF vs MTRAF Comparison Chart in %
LBLCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MTRAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LBLCF vs. MTRAF commentary
Nov 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBLCF is a Hold and MTRAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 29, 2025
Stock price -- (LBLCF: $44.56 vs. MTRAF: $71.47)
Brand notoriety: LBLCF and MTRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LBLCF: 10% vs. MTRAF: 33%
Market capitalization -- LBLCF: $52.21B vs. MTRAF: $15.35B
LBLCF [@Food Retail] is valued at $52.21B. MTRAF’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $15.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $52.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $12.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LBLCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMTRAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LBLCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MTRAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LBLCF is a better buy in the long-term than MTRAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LBLCF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTRAF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LBLCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MTRAF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LBLCF is a better buy in the short-term than MTRAF.

Price Growth

LBLCF (@Food Retail) experienced а +0.16% price change this week, while MTRAF (@Food Retail) price change was +0.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was +2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Retail (+2.28% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LBLCF($52.2B) has a higher market cap than MTRAF($15.3B). LBLCF has higher P/E ratio than MTRAF: LBLCF (30.56) vs MTRAF (21.68). LBLCF YTD gains are higher at: 35.654 vs. MTRAF (13.921). LBLCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.25B vs. MTRAF (2.08B). LBLCF has more cash in the bank: 1.9B vs. MTRAF (75.6M). MTRAF has less debt than LBLCF: MTRAF (4.4B) vs LBLCF (19.5B). LBLCF has higher revenues than MTRAF: LBLCF (62.3B) vs MTRAF (21.8B).
LBLCFMTRAFLBLCF / MTRAF
Capitalization52.2B15.3B341%
EBITDA7.25B2.08B349%
Gain YTD35.65413.921256%
P/E Ratio30.5621.68141%
Revenue62.3B21.8B286%
Total Cash1.9B75.6M2,513%
Total Debt19.5B4.4B443%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LBLCF vs MTRAF: Fundamental Ratings
LBLCF
MTRAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
411
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
224
SMR RATING
1..100
4053
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4454
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2144
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTRAF's Valuation (84) in the null industry is in the same range as LBLCF (89). This means that MTRAF’s stock grew similarly to LBLCF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRAF (24). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to MTRAF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRAF (53). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to MTRAF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRAF (54). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to MTRAF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRAF (44). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to MTRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LBLCFMTRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
36%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LBLCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MTRAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NRXP2.450.11
+4.70%
NRX Pharmaceuticals
BGMSP4.010.16
+4.16%
Bio Green Med Solution Inc
MRNA25.980.97
+3.88%
Moderna
PERI10.220.28
+2.82%
Perion Network Ltd
DNTH43.98-0.05
-0.11%
Dianthus Therapeutics

LBLCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LBLCF and WNGRF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBLCF and WNGRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBLCF
1D Price
Change %
LBLCF100%
N/A
WNGRF - LBLCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRRFY - LBLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
MSS - LBLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.26%
MTRAF - LBLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JSAIY - LBLCF
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
More

MTRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTRAF and EMLAF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTRAF and EMLAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTRAF
1D Price
Change %
MTRAF100%
N/A
EMLAF - MTRAF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WNGRF - MTRAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NGVC - MTRAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
IMKTA - MTRAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
LBLCF - MTRAF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More