LBLCF
Price
$41.01
Change
-$0.19 (-0.46%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
48.8B
MTRAF
Price
$71.59
Change
+$0.62 (+0.87%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.35B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LBLCF vs MTRAF

Header iconLBLCF vs MTRAF Comparison
Open Charts LBLCF vs MTRAFBanner chart's image
Loblaw Companies
Price$41.01
Change-$0.19 (-0.46%)
Volume$3.23K
Capitalization48.8B
Metro
Price$71.59
Change+$0.62 (+0.87%)
Volume$755
Capitalization15.35B
LBLCF vs MTRAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LBLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LBLCF vs. MTRAF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBLCF is a StrongBuy and MTRAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LBLCF: $41.01 vs. MTRAF: $71.59)
Brand notoriety: LBLCF and MTRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LBLCF: 14% vs. MTRAF: 2%
Market capitalization -- LBLCF: $48.8B vs. MTRAF: $15.35B
LBLCF [@Food Retail] is valued at $48.8B. MTRAF’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $15.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $48.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $12.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LBLCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTRAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LBLCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MTRAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LBLCF is a better buy in the long-term than MTRAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LBLCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTRAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LBLCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MTRAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTRAF is a better buy in the short-term than LBLCF.

Price Growth

LBLCF (@Food Retail) experienced а +0.81% price change this week, while MTRAF (@Food Retail) price change was +0.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.84%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Retail (-0.34% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LBLCF($48.8B) has a higher market cap than MTRAF($15.3B). LBLCF has higher P/E ratio than MTRAF: LBLCF (28.04) vs MTRAF (21.42). LBLCF YTD gains are higher at: 24.842 vs. MTRAF (14.108). LBLCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.25B vs. MTRAF (2.08B). LBLCF has higher revenues than MTRAF: LBLCF (62.3B) vs MTRAF (21.8B).
LBLCFMTRAFLBLCF / MTRAF
Capitalization48.8B15.3B319%
EBITDA7.25B2.08B349%
Gain YTD24.84214.108176%
P/E Ratio28.0421.42131%
Revenue62.3B21.8B286%
Total CashN/A75.6M-
Total DebtN/A4.4B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LBLCF vs MTRAF: Fundamental Ratings
LBLCF
MTRAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
255
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29
SMR RATING
1..100
4254
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5060
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4248
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTRAF's Valuation (87) in the null industry is in the same range as LBLCF (92). This means that MTRAF’s stock grew similarly to LBLCF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRAF (9). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to MTRAF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRAF (54). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to MTRAF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRAF (60). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to MTRAF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRAF (48). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to MTRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LBLCFMTRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
46%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
31%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LBLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PACK5.160.21
+4.24%
Ranpak Holdings Corp
ENR28.770.12
+0.42%
Energizer Holdings
PNW89.00-0.28
-0.31%
Pinnacle West Capital Corp
CNVS3.71-0.07
-1.85%
Cineverse Corp
UK1.07-0.05
-4.05%
Ucommune International Ltd

LBLCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LBLCF and WNGRF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBLCF and WNGRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBLCF
1D Price
Change %
LBLCF100%
-0.47%
WNGRF - LBLCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRRFY - LBLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSS - LBLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.15%
MTRAF - LBLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JSAIY - LBLCF
15%
Poorly correlated
+3.36%
More

MTRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTRAF and EMLAF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTRAF and EMLAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTRAF
1D Price
Change %
MTRAF100%
N/A
EMLAF - MTRAF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
WNGRF - MTRAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NGVC - MTRAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
IMKTA - MTRAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
LBLCF - MTRAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
More