LBLCF
Price
$41.34
Change
+$0.77 (+1.90%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
49.16B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
MTRAF
Price
$67.39
Change
+$0.61 (+0.91%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
14.86B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LBLCF vs MTRAF

Header iconLBLCF vs MTRAF Comparison
Open Charts LBLCF vs MTRAFBanner chart's image
Loblaw Companies
Price$41.34
Change+$0.77 (+1.90%)
Volume$2.71K
Capitalization49.16B
Metro
Price$67.39
Change+$0.61 (+0.91%)
Volume$565
Capitalization14.86B
LBLCF vs MTRAF Comparison Chart in %
LBLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LBLCF vs. MTRAF commentary
Oct 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBLCF is a Hold and MTRAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 17, 2025
Stock price -- (LBLCF: $41.34 vs. MTRAF: $67.39)
Brand notoriety: LBLCF and MTRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LBLCF: 18% vs. MTRAF: 8%
Market capitalization -- LBLCF: $49.16B vs. MTRAF: $14.86B
LBLCF [@Food Retail] is valued at $49.16B. MTRAF’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $14.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $49.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $12.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LBLCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTRAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LBLCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MTRAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LBLCF and MTRAF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LBLCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTRAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LBLCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MTRAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LBLCF is a better buy in the short-term than MTRAF.

Price Growth

LBLCF (@Food Retail) experienced а +5.95% price change this week, while MTRAF (@Food Retail) price change was +0.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was +1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Retail (+1.12% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LBLCF($49.2B) has a higher market cap than MTRAF($14.9B). LBLCF has higher P/E ratio than MTRAF: LBLCF (28.78) vs MTRAF (20.53). LBLCF YTD gains are higher at: 25.854 vs. MTRAF (7.412). LBLCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.25B vs. MTRAF (2.08B). LBLCF has more cash in the bank: 1.9B vs. MTRAF (75.6M). MTRAF has less debt than LBLCF: MTRAF (4.4B) vs LBLCF (19.5B). LBLCF has higher revenues than MTRAF: LBLCF (62.3B) vs MTRAF (21.8B).
LBLCFMTRAFLBLCF / MTRAF
Capitalization49.2B14.9B330%
EBITDA7.25B2.08B349%
Gain YTD25.8547.412349%
P/E Ratio28.7820.53140%
Revenue62.3B21.8B286%
Total Cash1.9B75.6M2,513%
Total Debt19.5B4.4B443%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LBLCF vs MTRAF: Fundamental Ratings
LBLCF
MTRAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1919
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
226
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5162
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3846
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTRAF's Valuation (89) in the null industry is in the same range as LBLCF (93). This means that MTRAF’s stock grew similarly to LBLCF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRAF (26). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to MTRAF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRAF (100). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to MTRAF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRAF (62). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to MTRAF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRAF (46). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to MTRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LBLCFMTRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
33%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LBLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ORCX48.772.85
+6.21%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF
OVF29.170.12
+0.42%
Overlay Shares Foreign Equity ETF
SCHJ25.000.05
+0.18%
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
NUSB25.29N/A
N/A
Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF
BUFR33.24-0.13
-0.39%
FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF

MTRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTRAF and EMLAF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTRAF and EMLAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTRAF
1D Price
Change %
MTRAF100%
N/A
EMLAF - MTRAF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.78%
WNGRF - MTRAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
NGVC - MTRAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.26%
IMKTA - MTRAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
LBLCF - MTRAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
More