LBLCF
Price
$165.09
Change
+$0.53 (+0.32%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
49.13B
WNGRF
Price
$192.53
Change
-$0.11 (-0.06%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
24.57B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LBLCF vs WNGRF

Header iconLBLCF vs WNGRF Comparison
Open Charts LBLCF vs WNGRFBanner chart's image
Loblaw Companies
Price$165.09
Change+$0.53 (+0.32%)
Volume$2.78K
Capitalization49.13B
Weston George Ltd. (Canada)
Price$192.53
Change-$0.11 (-0.06%)
Volume$22.9K
Capitalization24.57B
LBLCF vs WNGRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LBLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WNGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LBLCF vs. WNGRF commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBLCF is a StrongBuy and WNGRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (LBLCF: $165.09 vs. WNGRF: $192.53)
Brand notoriety: LBLCF and WNGRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LBLCF: 34% vs. WNGRF: 37%
Market capitalization -- LBLCF: $49.13B vs. WNGRF: $24.57B
LBLCF [@Food Retail] is valued at $49.13B. WNGRF’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $24.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $49.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $12.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LBLCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWNGRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LBLCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WNGRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LBLCF and WNGRF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LBLCF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WNGRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LBLCF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WNGRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LBLCF is a better buy in the short-term than WNGRF.

Price Growth

LBLCF (@Food Retail) experienced а -0.42% price change this week, while WNGRF (@Food Retail) price change was -0.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Retail (+0.14% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LBLCF($49.1B) has a higher market cap than WNGRF($24.6B). WNGRF has higher P/E ratio than LBLCF: WNGRF (34.48) vs LBLCF (28.14). LBLCF YTD gains are higher at: 25.650 vs. WNGRF (21.793). LBLCF (7.25B) and WNGRF (7.23B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . WNGRF has more cash in the bank: 2.13B vs. LBLCF (1.9B). LBLCF has less debt than WNGRF: LBLCF (19.5B) vs WNGRF (22.7B). WNGRF (62.9B) and LBLCF (62.3B) have equivalent revenues.
LBLCFWNGRFLBLCF / WNGRF
Capitalization49.1B24.6B200%
EBITDA7.25B7.23B100%
Gain YTD25.65021.793118%
P/E Ratio28.1434.4882%
Revenue62.3B62.9B99%
Total Cash1.9B2.13B89%
Total Debt19.5B22.7B86%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LBLCF vs WNGRF: Fundamental Ratings
LBLCF
WNGRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
292
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27
SMR RATING
1..100
4247
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3616
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WNGRF's Valuation (90) in the null industry is in the same range as LBLCF (91). This means that WNGRF’s stock grew similarly to LBLCF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as WNGRF (7). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to WNGRF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as WNGRF (47). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to WNGRF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as WNGRF (49). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to WNGRF’s over the last 12 months.

WNGRF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as LBLCF (36). This means that WNGRF’s stock grew similarly to LBLCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LBLCFWNGRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LBLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WNGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRTC18.010.51
+2.91%
PureTech Health plc
PPC47.970.21
+0.44%
Pilgrim's Pride Corp
NGVT54.57-0.52
-0.94%
Ingevity Corp
LVO0.64-0.01
-1.80%
LiveOne
RDHL1.36-0.05
-3.55%
Redhill Biopharma Ltd

LBLCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LBLCF and WNGRF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBLCF and WNGRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBLCF
1D Price
Change %
LBLCF100%
+0.32%
WNGRF - LBLCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRRFY - LBLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
MSS - LBLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.58%
MTRAF - LBLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
JSAIY - LBLCF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
More

WNGRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WNGRF and MTRAF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WNGRF and MTRAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WNGRF
1D Price
Change %
WNGRF100%
N/A
MTRAF - WNGRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
LBLCF - WNGRF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
KR - WNGRF
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
GO - WNGRF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
NGVC - WNGRF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
More