LBSR
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.54M
NBMFF
Price
$0.37
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
28.25M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LBSR vs NBMFF

Header iconLBSR vs NBMFF Comparison
Open Charts LBSR vs NBMFFBanner chart's image
Liberty Star Uranium & Metals
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.12K
Capitalization1.54M
NEO Battery Materials
Price$0.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.11K
Capitalization28.25M
LBSR vs NBMFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LBSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LBSR vs. NBMFF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSR is a Buy and NBMFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LBSR: $0.07 vs. NBMFF: $0.37)
Brand notoriety: LBSR and NBMFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LBSR: 2% vs. NBMFF: 294%
Market capitalization -- LBSR: $1.54M vs. NBMFF: $28.25M
LBSR [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.54M. NBMFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $28.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LBSR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNBMFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LBSR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NBMFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LBSR and NBMFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LBSR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBMFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LBSR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NBMFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LBSR is a better buy in the short-term than NBMFF.

Price Growth

LBSR (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.85% price change this week, while NBMFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -7.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

LBSR is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBMFF($28.2M) has a higher market cap than LBSR($1.54M). NBMFF YTD gains are higher at: -32.727 vs. LBSR (-35.000). LBSR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -106.86K vs. NBMFF (-1.95M). NBMFF has more cash in the bank: 1.09M vs. LBSR (6.11K). NBMFF has less debt than LBSR: NBMFF (0) vs LBSR (224K). LBSR (0) and NBMFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LBSRNBMFFLBSR / NBMFF
Capitalization1.54M28.2M5%
EBITDA-106.86K-1.95M5%
Gain YTD-35.000-32.727107%
P/E Ratio1.19N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.11K1.09M1%
Total Debt224K0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LBSR vs NBMFF: Fundamental Ratings
LBSR
NBMFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10070
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LBSR's Valuation (88) in the null industry is in the same range as NBMFF (88). This means that LBSR’s stock grew similarly to NBMFF’s over the last 12 months.

NBMFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as LBSR (100). This means that NBMFF’s stock grew similarly to LBSR’s over the last 12 months.

NBMFF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as LBSR (100). This means that NBMFF’s stock grew similarly to LBSR’s over the last 12 months.

NBMFF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBSR (92). This means that NBMFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBSR’s over the last 12 months.

LBSR's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NBMFF (100). This means that LBSR’s stock grew significantly faster than NBMFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LBSRNBMFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LBSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CASS46.200.53
+1.16%
Cass Information Systems
CELH46.560.19
+0.41%
Celsius Holdings
CSCI3.41N/A
N/A
COSCIENS Biopharma Inc
CRBU1.37N/A
N/A
Caribou Biosciences
ZD32.29-0.26
-0.80%
Ziff Davis

LBSR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LBSR and CTXDF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBSR and CTXDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBSR
1D Price
Change %
LBSR100%
-0.14%
CTXDF - LBSR
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.59%
EDDYF - LBSR
25%
Poorly correlated
+7.07%
NGPHF - LBSR
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.36%
TMASF - LBSR
11%
Poorly correlated
-6.15%
NBMFF - LBSR
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NBMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBMFF and ASHXF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBMFF and ASHXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBMFF
1D Price
Change %
NBMFF100%
N/A
ASHXF - NBMFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLTLF - NBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.93%
ECRAF - NBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUMC - NBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OMHLF - NBMFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More