Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWAX vs RMFEX
LBWAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBWAX vs RMFEX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value A
Price$22.48
Change+$0.09 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.93M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.33
Change-$0.21 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.19B
LBWAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWAX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LBWAX (92.9M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBWAX: RMFEX (1.46) vs LBWAX (1.36). LBWAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBWAX (15 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBWAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LBWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWAX: RMFEX (250) vs LBWAX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.93 vs. LBWAX (-2.09). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 54.19 vs. LBWAX (33.10).
| LBWAX | RMFEX | LBWAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.62 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.894 | 12.910 | 92% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.9M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.46 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.09 | 5.93 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.84 | 28.94 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.10 | 54.19 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.83 | 91.83 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement