Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RWEBX
LBWCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RWEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$22.11
Change+$0.09 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.93M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.54
Change-$0.23 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.42B
LBWCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. LBWCX (92.9M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RWEBX (0.76) vs LBWCX (0.66). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RWEBX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.20 vs. LBWCX (-2.87). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.61 vs. LBWCX (27.91).
| LBWCX | RWEBX | LBWCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.06 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.06 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.156 | 7.797 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.9M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.76 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.87 | 3.20 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.09 | 26.70 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.91 | 39.61 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.62 | 66.23 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement