Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RWEBX
LBWCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RWEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$22.10
Change-$0.04 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.67M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.91
Change-$0.17 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.3B
LBWCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. LBWCX (97.7M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RWEBX (0.76) vs LBWCX (0.65). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RWEBX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.21 vs. LBWCX (2.04). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 48.18 vs. LBWCX (34.28).
| LBWCX | RWEBX | LBWCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.06 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.06 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.762 | 10.050 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.7M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.76 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.04 | 6.21 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.12 | 42.84 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.28 | 48.18 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.70 | 76.27 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement