Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RWMHX
LBWCX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RWMHX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$22.11
Change+$0.09 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.93M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$65.89
Change-$0.23 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.42B
LBWCX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RWMHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. LBWCX (92.9M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RWMHX (1.33) vs LBWCX (0.66). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RWMHX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.91 vs. LBWCX (-2.87). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 43.18 vs. LBWCX (27.91).
| LBWCX | RWMHX | LBWCX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.41 | 463% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.41 | 466% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.156 | 8.429 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.9M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.33 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.87 | 3.91 | -73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.09 | 29.08 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.91 | 43.18 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.62 | 71.17 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement