Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWIX vs RWEBX
LBWIX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBWIX vs RWEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value I
Price$22.56
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.24M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.77
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
LBWIX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWIX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWIX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. LBWIX (93.2M). LBWIX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: LBWIX (1.56) vs RWEBX (0.76). LBWIX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LBWIX (15 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than LBWIX (0.88). LBWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWIX: RWEBX (250) vs LBWIX (1000000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.78 vs. LBWIX (-0.70). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.82 vs. LBWIX (36.33).
| LBWIX | RWEBX | LBWIX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.06 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.06 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.631 | 8.175 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.2M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 0.76 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.70 | 3.78 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.35 | 27.15 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.33 | 40.82 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.82 | 66.81 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement