Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBVX vs RMFEX
LCBVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LCBVX vs RMFEX
LCBVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBVX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LCBVX (2.44B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LCBVX: RMFEX (1.41) vs LCBVX (0.47). LCBVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LCBVX (13 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). LCBVX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LCBVX (18.00). LCBVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LCBVX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX (7.47) and LCBVX (7.33) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.95 vs. LCBVX (15.25).
| LCBVX | RMFEX | LCBVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.62 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.62 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.893 | 9.507 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.44B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.41 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.33 | 7.47 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.13 | 36.54 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.25 | 35.95 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.62 | 98.87 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement