Ad is loading...
LCCAX vs VTSMX
LCCAX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts LCCAX vs VTSMX
Columbia Contrarian Core A
Price$31.25
Change+$0.13 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.88B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$125.95
Change+$0.29 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7T
LCCAX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCCAX vs. VTSMX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCCAX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.7T vs. LCCAX (12.9B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than LCCAX: VTSMX (1.25) vs LCCAX (0.33). LCCAX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: LCCAX (26 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). LCCAX (0.99) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). LCCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). LCCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: LCCAX (2000) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.35 vs. LCCAX (-5.61). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 80.93 vs. LCCAX (29.30).
| LCCAX | VTSMX | LCCAX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.14 | 707% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.14 | 707% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.009 | -10.853 | 101% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 1.7T | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 1.25 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.61 | 4.35 | -129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.54 | 17.53 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.30 | 80.93 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.00 | 145.67 | 30% |