Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCF vs RECS
LCF vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts LCF vs RECS
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF
Price$37.18
Change-$0.16 (-0.43%)
Volume$1.74K
Net Assets46.47M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.44
Change-$0.06 (-0.17%)
Volume$312.08K
Net Assets2.89B
LCF vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCF vs. RECS commentary
Jun 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCF is a Hold and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.89B vs. LCF (46.5M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than LCF: RECS (2.369) vs LCF (2.087). LCF was incepted earlier than RECS: LCF (3 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than LCF (0.56). RECS has a higher turnover LCF (7.00) vs LCF (7.00).
| LCF | RECS | LCF / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 2.087 | 2.369 | 88% |
| Net Assets | 46.5M | 2.89B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.15 | 373% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 49.00 | 14% |
| Yield | 0.63 | 0.69 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FLOT | 50.94 | 0.04 | +0.08% |
| iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | |||
| MPA | 10.72 | -0.01 | -0.09% |
| Blackrock Muniyield Pennsylvania Quality Fund | |||
| EUO | 28.69 | -0.19 | -0.66% |
| ProShares UltraShort Euro | |||
| XNTK | 224.20 | -1.63 | -0.72% |
| SPDR® NYSE Technology ETF | |||
| DBJP | 74.16 | -2.66 | -3.47% |
| Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | |||
LCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LCF has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LCF jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCF | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| GS - LCF | 76% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| AMZN - LCF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| AAPL - LCF | 72% Closely correlated | +2.25% | ||
| DD - LCF | 72% Closely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| META - LCF | 71% Closely correlated | -1.93% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
More | ||||