Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCF vs RECS
LCF vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts LCF vs RECS
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF
Price$40.35
Change-$1.08 (-2.61%)
Volume$189
Net Assets52.15M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$39.30
Change-$0.62 (-1.55%)
Volume$884
Net Assets4.31B
LCF vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCF vs. RECS commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCF is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 4.31B vs. LCF (52.2M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than LCF: RECS (13.634) vs LCF (10.685). LCF was incepted earlier than RECS: LCF (3 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than LCF (0.56). RECS has a higher turnover LCF (7.00) vs LCF (7.00).
| LCF | RECS | LCF / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 10.685 | 13.634 | 78% |
| Net Assets | 52.2M | 4.31B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.15 | 373% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 49.00 | 14% |
| Yield | 0.54 | 0.59 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LCF | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
LCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LCF has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LCF jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCF | 100% | -2.69% | ||
| GS - LCF | 73% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| AAPL - LCF | 66% Closely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| AMZN - LCF | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| META - LCF | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| DD - LCF | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -1.45% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
More | ||||