Ad is loading...
LCFLX vs RMFCX
LCFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LCFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value C
Price$11.53
Change-$0.16 (-1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.88M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$50.23
Change-$0.51 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.16B
LCFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCFLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 93.2B vs. LCFLX (30.9M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LCFLX: RMFCX (1.34) vs LCFLX (0.00). LCFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LCFLX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LCFLX (2.67) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LCFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCFLX: RMFCX (250) vs LCFLX (1500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.25 vs. LCFLX (-5.11). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. LCFLX (7.64).
| LCFLX | RMFCX | LCFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.91 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 0.91 | 293% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.008 | -7.697 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.9M | 93.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.34 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.11 | -4.25 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.27 | -0.65 | 3,427% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.64 | 45.42 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.29 | - |