Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCFLX vs RMFCX
LCFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LCFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value C
Price$13.75
Change+$0.12 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.98M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$58.09
Change+$0.41 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106B
LCFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCFLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. LCFLX (38M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LCFLX: RMFCX (1.31) vs LCFLX (0.00). LCFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LCFLX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LCFLX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LCFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCFLX: RMFCX (250) vs LCFLX (1500). LCFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.72 vs. RMFCX (8.54). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.56 vs. LCFLX (7.29).
| LCFLX | RMFCX | LCFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.91 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 0.91 | 263% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.927 | 7.071 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.72 | 8.54 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.10 | 26.18 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.29 | 60.56 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement