Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCFLX vs RMFCX
LCFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LCFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value C
Price$13.44
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.23M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.12
Change+$0.21 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.55B
LCFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCFLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LCFLX (35.2M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LCFLX: RMFCX (1.31) vs LCFLX (0.00). LCFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LCFLX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LCFLX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LCFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCFLX: RMFCX (250) vs LCFLX (1500). LCFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.65 vs. RMFCX (8.31). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.43 vs. LCFLX (2.38).
| LCFLX | RMFCX | LCFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.91 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 0.91 | 263% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.233 | 4.964 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.2M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.65 | 8.31 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.77 | 18.02 | -43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.38 | 53.43 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers