Ad is loading...
LCFLX vs RMFCX
LCFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LCFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value C
Price$13.49
Change+$0.07 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.99M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.77
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
LCFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCFLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. LCFLX (33M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LCFLX: RMFCX (1.69) vs LCFLX (0.00). LCFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LCFLX (5 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LCFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCFLX: RMFCX (250) vs LCFLX (1500). LCFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.20 vs. RMFCX (12.43). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.82 vs. LCFLX (-13.27).
| LCFLX | RMFCX | LCFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.849 | 2.162 | 178% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33M | 103B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.69 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.20 | 12.43 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.08 | 12.60 | -104% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.27 | 37.82 | -35% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.18 | - |