Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCFLX vs RWEBX
LCFLX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCFLX vs RWEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value C
Price$14.80
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.79M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.77
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
LCFLX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCFLX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCFLX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. LCFLX (85.8M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than LCFLX: RWEBX (0.76) vs LCFLX (0.00). LCFLX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LCFLX (6 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LCFLX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LCFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCFLX: RWEBX (250) vs LCFLX (1500). LCFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.00 vs. RWEBX (3.78). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.82 vs. LCFLX (-0.44).
| LCFLX | RWEBX | LCFLX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.06 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 1.06 | 225% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.703 | 8.175 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.8M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.76 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.00 | 3.78 | 238% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.65 | 27.15 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.44 | 40.82 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement