Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCFLX vs RWEBX
LCFLX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCFLX vs RWEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value C
Price$15.06
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.16M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$67.08
Change+$0.11 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.01B
LCFLX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCFLX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCFLX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. LCFLX (68.2M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than LCFLX: RWEBX (0.76) vs LCFLX (0.00). LCFLX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LCFLX (6 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LCFLX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LCFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCFLX: RWEBX (250) vs LCFLX (1500). LCFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.38 vs. RWEBX (5.65). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.09 vs. LCFLX (12.13).
| LCFLX | RWEBX | LCFLX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.06 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 1.06 | 225% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.704 | 10.329 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.2M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.76 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.38 | 5.65 | 255% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.76 | 43.20 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.13 | 50.09 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement