Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCFLX vs RWMHX
LCFLX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LCFLX vs RWMHX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value C
Price$15.06
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.16M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$67.39
Change+$0.12 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.01B
LCFLX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCFLX vs. RWMHX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCFLX is a Buy and RWMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. LCFLX (68.2M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than LCFLX: RWMHX (1.33) vs LCFLX (0.00). LCFLX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LCFLX (6 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). LCFLX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). LCFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCFLX: RWMHX (250) vs LCFLX (1500). LCFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.38 vs. RWMHX (6.37). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 53.96 vs. LCFLX (12.13).
| LCFLX | RWMHX | LCFLX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.41 | 417% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 0.41 | 583% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.704 | 10.898 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.2M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.38 | 6.37 | 226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.76 | 45.89 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.13 | 53.96 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement