LCGMF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
35.83M
LITM
Price
$3.76
Change
+$0.03 (+0.80%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
29.42M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LCGMF vs LITM

Header iconLCGMF vs LITM Comparison
Open Charts LCGMF vs LITMBanner chart's image
LION COPPER & GOLD
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$803.52K
Capitalization35.83M
Snow Lake Resources
Price$3.76
Change+$0.03 (+0.80%)
Volume$137.83K
Capitalization29.42M
LCGMF vs LITM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LCGMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LITM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LCGMF vs. LITM commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCGMF is a Hold and LITM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LCGMF: $0.09 vs. LITM: $3.76)
Brand notoriety: LCGMF and LITM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LCGMF: 639% vs. LITM: 40%
Market capitalization -- LCGMF: $35.83M vs. LITM: $29.42M
LCGMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $35.83M. LITM’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $29.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LCGMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLITM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LCGMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LITM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LITM is a better buy in the long-term than LCGMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LCGMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LITM’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LCGMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LITM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LCGMF is a better buy in the short-term than LITM.

Price Growth

LCGMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.97% price change this week, while LITM (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -6.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LCGMF($35.8M) has a higher market cap than LITM($29.4M). LCGMF YTD gains are higher at: 65.602 vs. LITM (-69.872). LCGMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.99M vs. LITM (-6.85M). LCGMF (0) and LITM (0) have equivalent revenues.
LCGMFLITMLCGMF / LITM
Capitalization35.8M29.4M122%
EBITDA-4.99M-6.85M73%
Gain YTD65.602-69.872-94%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.56MN/A-
Total Debt698KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LCGMF: Fundamental Ratings
LCGMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
93
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LCGMFLITM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LCGMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LITM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNPR44.215.37
+13.83%
Monopar Therapeutics Inc
ETSY54.061.85
+3.54%
Etsy
GSK40.500.89
+2.25%
GSK plc
SAFT72.58-0.49
-0.67%
Safety Insurance Group
SPRU1.53-0.03
-1.92%
Spruce Power Holding Corp

LCGMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LCGMF and NDMCF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LCGMF and NDMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LCGMF
1D Price
Change %
LCGMF100%
-0.49%
NDMCF - LCGMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COPAF - LCGMF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.21%
GRLRF - LCGMF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
ARAAF - LCGMF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
LITM - LCGMF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
More