LCID
Price
$2.16
Change
+$0.11 (+5.37%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.55B
30 days until earnings call
YAMHF
Price
$7.57
Change
+$0.01 (+0.13%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.35B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LCID vs YAMHF

Header iconLCID vs YAMHF Comparison
Open Charts LCID vs YAMHFBanner chart's image
Lucid Group
Price$2.16
Change+$0.11 (+5.37%)
Volume$211.39M
Capitalization6.55B
Yamaha Motor
Price$7.57
Change+$0.01 (+0.13%)
Volume$406
Capitalization7.35B
LCID vs YAMHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LCID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YAMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LCID vs. YAMHF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCID is a Hold and YAMHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (LCID: $2.16 vs. YAMHF: $7.57)
Brand notoriety: LCID and YAMHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LCID: 153% vs. YAMHF: 61%
Market capitalization -- LCID: $6.55B vs. YAMHF: $7.35B
LCID [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $6.55B. YAMHF’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $7.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $559.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $35.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LCID’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYAMHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LCID’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • YAMHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, YAMHF is a better buy in the long-term than LCID.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LCID’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YAMHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LCID’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • YAMHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, YAMHF is a better buy in the short-term than LCID.

Price Growth

LCID (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -1.82% price change this week, while YAMHF (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +1.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

LCID is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+1.58% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YAMHF($7.35B) has a higher market cap than LCID($6.55B). LCID has higher P/E ratio than YAMHF: LCID (10.31) vs YAMHF (6.43). YAMHF YTD gains are higher at: -9.341 vs. LCID (-28.477). YAMHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 230B vs. LCID (-2.57B). YAMHF has more cash in the bank: 308B vs. LCID (3.86B). LCID has less debt than YAMHF: LCID (2.43B) vs YAMHF (485B). YAMHF has higher revenues than LCID: YAMHF (1.71T) vs LCID (595M).
LCIDYAMHFLCID / YAMHF
Capitalization6.55B7.35B89%
EBITDA-2.57B230B-1%
Gain YTD-28.477-9.341305%
P/E Ratio10.316.43160%
Revenue595M1.71T0%
Total Cash3.86B308B1%
Total Debt2.43B485B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
YAMHF: Fundamental Ratings
YAMHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65
SMR RATING
1..100
49
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LCIDYAMHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LCID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YAMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XC35.100.38
+1.10%
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
FSMD42.500.31
+0.73%
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
IPPP9.920.02
+0.17%
Preferred-Plus ETF
HECO33.60N/A
N/A
SPDR Galaxy Hdg Dgtl Ast Ecosystem ETF
AFB10.36-0.01
-0.10%
Alliance National Municipal Income Fund

LCID and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LCID has been loosely correlated with RIVN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LCID jumps, then RIVN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LCID
1D Price
Change %
LCID100%
+5.37%
RIVN - LCID
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
NIO - LCID
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
TSLA - LCID
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
GP - LCID
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.37%
VWAGY - LCID
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
More

YAMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YAMHF and ARGGY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YAMHF and ARGGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YAMHF
1D Price
Change %
YAMHF100%
+0.13%
ARGGY - YAMHF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
LCID - YAMHF
8%
Poorly correlated
+5.37%
STLA - YAMHF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
FFAI - YAMHF
3%
Poorly correlated
+15.95%
VLCN - YAMHF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
More