LCKYF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.02 (+40.00%)
Updated
Dec 13 closing price
VITFF
Price
$0.35
Change
+$0.02 (+6.06%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

LCKYF vs VITFF

Header iconLCKYF vs VITFF Comparison
Open Charts LCKYF vs VITFFBanner chart's image
GOLDEN SKY MINERALS
Price$0.07
Change+$0.02 (+40.00%)
Volume$23.1K
CapitalizationN/A
Victoria Gold
Price$0.35
Change+$0.02 (+6.06%)
Volume$184.17K
CapitalizationN/A
LCKYF vs VITFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
LCKYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LCKYF vs. VITFF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCKYF is a Hold and VITFF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (LCKYF: $0.07 vs. VITFF: $0.35)
Brand notoriety: LCKYF and VITFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LCKYF: 537% vs. VITFF: 100%
Market capitalization -- LCKYF: $2M vs. VITFF: $427.15M
LCKYF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2M. VITFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $427.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LCKYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVITFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LCKYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VITFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LCKYF and VITFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LCKYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LCKYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

LCKYF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +23.10% price change this week, while VITFF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.69% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITFF($427M) has a higher market cap than LCKYF($2M). LCKYF YTD gains are higher at: -2.571 vs. VITFF (-93.496). VITFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. LCKYF (-968.35K). VITFF has more cash in the bank: 36.1M vs. LCKYF (1.43M). VITFF has higher revenues than LCKYF: VITFF (359M) vs LCKYF (0).
LCKYFVITFFLCKYF / VITFF
Capitalization2M427M0%
EBITDA-968.35K124M-1%
Gain YTD-2.571-93.4963%
P/E RatioN/A25.71-
Revenue0359M-
Total Cash1.43M36.1M4%
Total DebtN/A269M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LCKYF vs VITFF: Fundamental Ratings
LCKYF
VITFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9449
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9886
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8790
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LCKYF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as VITFF (40). This means that LCKYF’s stock grew similarly to VITFF’s over the last 12 months.

LCKYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VITFF (100). This means that LCKYF’s stock grew similarly to VITFF’s over the last 12 months.

VITFF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as LCKYF (98). This means that VITFF’s stock grew similarly to LCKYF’s over the last 12 months.

LCKYF's Price Growth Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as VITFF (90). This means that LCKYF’s stock grew similarly to VITFF’s over the last 12 months.

LCKYF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VITFF (100). This means that LCKYF’s stock grew similarly to VITFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LCKYFVITFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LCKYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APHGX22.46-0.16
-0.71%
Artisan Global Value Institutional
NBRRX26.95-0.27
-0.99%
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val R3
SFMIX41.31-0.51
-1.22%
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr R5
VNVNX28.69-0.57
-1.95%
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap N
TWGIX62.61-3.63
-5.48%
American Century Growth I

LCKYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LCKYF has been loosely correlated with VITFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LCKYF jumps, then VITFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LCKYF
1D Price
Change %
LCKYF100%
N/A
VITFF - LCKYF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VLMZF - LCKYF
38%
Loosely correlated
-45.45%
SVGAF - LCKYF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GORIF - LCKYF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SICNF - LCKYF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

VITFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VITFF has been loosely correlated with PMDRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VITFF jumps, then PMDRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VITFF
1D Price
Change %
VITFF100%
N/A
PMDRF - VITFF
60%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BYAGF - VITFF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
LCKYF - VITFF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CBGZF - VITFF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IMRFF - VITFF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More