Ad is loading...
LCLAX vs PMBPX
LCLAX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts LCLAX vs PMBPX
LCLAX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCLAX vs. PMBPX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCLAX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 28.4B vs. LCLAX (3.02B). PMBPX pays higher dividends than LCLAX: PMBPX (0.01) vs LCLAX (0.00). LCLAX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: LCLAX (12 years) vs PMBPX (24 years). LCLAX (1.40) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.84). LCLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCLAX: PMBPX (0) vs LCLAX (1000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.10 vs. LCLAX (4.15). LCLAX return over 5 years is better than : 73.46 vs. PMBPX (61.51).
| LCLAX | PMBPX | LCLAX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.84 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.84 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.190 | -4.464 | 295% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.02B | 28.4B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.15 | 7.10 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.87 | 18.81 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.46 | 61.51 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 189.53 | 79.35 | 239% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers