LCMRF
Price
$2.25
Change
-$0.15 (-6.25%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
WHGPF
Price
$0.54
Change
-$0.04 (-6.90%)
Updated
Mar 5 closing price
Capitalization
167.98M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LCMRF vs WHGPF

Header iconLCMRF vs WHGPF Comparison
Open Charts LCMRF vs WHGPFBanner chart's image
La Comer SAB De CV
Price$2.25
Change-$0.15 (-6.25%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
Warehouse Group (THE)
Price$0.54
Change-$0.04 (-6.90%)
Volume$750
Capitalization167.98M
LCMRF vs WHGPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LCMRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LCMRF vs. WHGPF commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCMRF is a Hold and WHGPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (LCMRF: $2.25 vs. WHGPF: $0.54)
Brand notoriety: LCMRF and WHGPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Department Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LCMRF: 172% vs. WHGPF: 100%
Market capitalization -- LCMRF: $0 vs. WHGPF: $167.98M
LCMRF [@Department Stores] is valued at $0. WHGPF’s [@Department Stores] market capitalization is $167.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Department Stores] industry ranges from $12.34T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Department Stores] industry is $5.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LCMRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWHGPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LCMRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WHGPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LCMRF and WHGPF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LCMRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LCMRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

LCMRF (@Department Stores) experienced а -6.25% price change this week, while WHGPF (@Department Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was -2.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Department Stores (-2.19% weekly)

A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl’s Corporation, Macy’s Inc., and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LCMRF YTD gains are higher at: 32.159 vs. WHGPF (-7.095). LCMRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.78B vs. WHGPF (136M). LCMRF has higher revenues than WHGPF: LCMRF (43.3B) vs WHGPF (3.01B).
LCMRFWHGPFLCMRF / WHGPF
CapitalizationN/A168M-
EBITDA4.78B136M3,514%
Gain YTD32.159-7.095-453%
P/E RatioN/A51.89-
Revenue43.3B3.01B1,438%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WHGPF: Fundamental Ratings
WHGPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
36
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LCMRFWHGPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LCMRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIJ12.290.16
+1.29%
ProShares UltraShort Industrials
PSR90.660.52
+0.57%
Invesco Active US Real Estate
EMO47.85-0.01
-0.02%
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund
YANG26.91-0.05
-0.19%
Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X ETF
BETH.X4429.460000-108.125490
-2.38%
Beacon ETH cryptocurrency

LCMRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LCMRF and ELPQF have been poorly correlated (+-0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LCMRF and ELPQF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LCMRF
1D Price
Change %
LCMRF100%
N/A
ELPQF - LCMRF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHGPF - LCMRF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PPASF - LCMRF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A

WHGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WHGPF and ELPQF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WHGPF and ELPQF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHGPF
1D Price
Change %
WHGPF100%
N/A
ELPQF - WHGPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LCMRF - WHGPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PPASF - WHGPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A