LCSHF
Price
$8.90
Change
+$0.17 (+1.95%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.12B
40 days until earnings call
TRRSF
Price
$27.39
Change
-$0.46 (-1.65%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.31B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LCSHF vs TRRSF

Header iconLCSHF vs TRRSF Comparison
Open Charts LCSHF vs TRRSFBanner chart's image
Lancashire Holdings
Price$8.90
Change+$0.17 (+1.95%)
Volume$700
Capitalization2.12B
Trisura Group
Price$27.39
Change-$0.46 (-1.65%)
Volume$1.82K
Capitalization1.31B
LCSHF vs TRRSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LCSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LCSHF vs. TRRSF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCSHF is a Buy and TRRSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (LCSHF: $8.90 vs. TRRSF: $27.39)
Brand notoriety: LCSHF and TRRSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LCSHF: 13% vs. TRRSF: 3%
Market capitalization -- LCSHF: $2.12B vs. TRRSF: $1.31B
LCSHF [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $2.12B. TRRSF’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $16.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LCSHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRRSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LCSHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRRSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LCSHF is a better buy in the long-term than TRRSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LCSHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRRSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LCSHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TRRSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRRSF is a better buy in the short-term than LCSHF.

Price Growth

LCSHF (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а +1.95% price change this week, while TRRSF (@Specialty Insurance) price change was -7.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

LCSHF is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (-0.91% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LCSHF($2.12B) has a higher market cap than TRRSF($1.31B). TRRSF has higher P/E ratio than LCSHF: TRRSF (15.16) vs LCSHF (9.67). LCSHF YTD gains are higher at: 7.100 vs. TRRSF (0.403). TRRSF has more cash in the bank: 1.52B vs. LCSHF (653M). TRRSF has less debt than LCSHF: TRRSF (158M) vs LCSHF (469M). LCSHF has higher revenues than TRRSF: LCSHF (1.82B) vs TRRSF (839M).
LCSHFTRRSFLCSHF / TRRSF
Capitalization2.12B1.31B162%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.1000.4031,761%
P/E Ratio9.6715.1664%
Revenue1.82B839M217%
Total Cash653M1.52B43%
Total Debt469M158M297%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LCSHF vs TRRSF: Fundamental Ratings
LCSHF
TRRSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3029
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10062
SMR RATING
1..100
6854
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4761
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1185
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LCSHF's Valuation (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRRSF (86). This means that LCSHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

TRRSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LCSHF (100). This means that TRRSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LCSHF’s over the last 12 months.

TRRSF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as LCSHF (68). This means that TRRSF’s stock grew similarly to LCSHF’s over the last 12 months.

LCSHF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as TRRSF (61). This means that LCSHF’s stock grew similarly to TRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

LCSHF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRRSF (85). This means that LCSHF’s stock grew significantly faster than TRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LCSHFTRRSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LCSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYLDX187.83N/A
N/A
Rydex Dow 2x Strategy A
VETAX46.70N/A
N/A
Victory Sycamore Established Value A
TIOHX17.20N/A
N/A
Nuveen International Opps I
CFGRX56.92N/A
N/A
Commerce Growth
GIIRX10.40N/A
N/A
Nationwide International Index R

LCSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LCSHF and RYAN have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LCSHF and RYAN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LCSHF
1D Price
Change %
LCSHF100%
N/A
RYAN - LCSHF
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
FACO - LCSHF
7%
Poorly correlated
-4.26%
TRRSF - LCSHF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
BZLYF - LCSHF
3%
Poorly correlated
+6.31%
ACMTA - LCSHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TRRSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRRSF and RDN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRRSF and RDN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRRSF
1D Price
Change %
TRRSF100%
-1.65%
RDN - TRRSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
ESNT - TRRSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
FNF - TRRSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
TIPT - TRRSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-15.21%
MTG - TRRSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
More